Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulating of the Fda Benchmark Blood Pump With Different Coefficient Sets and Scaler Shear Stress Models Used in the Power-Law Hemolysis Model

dc.contributor.author Önder, Ahmet
dc.contributor.author İncebay, Ömer
dc.contributor.author Yapıcı, Rafet
dc.date.accessioned 2024-09-22T13:33:00Z
dc.date.available 2024-09-22T13:33:00Z
dc.date.issued 2025
dc.description.abstract Hemolysis is the most important issue to consider in the design and optimization of blood-contacting devices. Although the use of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) in hemolysis prediction studies provides convenience and has promising potential, it is an extremely challenging process. Hemolysis predictions with CFD depend on the mesh, implementation method, coefficient set, and scalar-shear-stress model. To this end, an attempt was made to find the combination that would provide the most accurate result in hemolysis prediction with the commonly cited power-law based hemolysis model. In the hemolysis predictions conducted using CFD on the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) benchmark blood pump, 3 different scalar-shear-stress models, and 5 different coefficient sets with the power-law based hemolysis model were used. Also, a mesh independence test based on hemolysis and pressure head was performed. The pressure head results of CFD simulations were compared with published pressure head of the FDA benchmark blood pump and a good agreement was observed. In addition, results of CFD-hemolysis predictions which are conducted with scalar-shear-stress model and coefficient set combinations were compared with experimental hemolysis data at three operating conditions such as 6-7 L/min flow rates at 3500 rpm rotational speeds and 6 L/min at 2500 rpm. One of the combinations of the scalar-shear-stress model and the coefficient set was found to be within the error limits of the experimental measurements, while all other combinations overestimated hemolysis. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s10047-024-01468-6
dc.identifier.issn 1434-7229
dc.identifier.issn 1619-0904
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85201932303
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-024-01468-6
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13091/6267
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Springer Japan Kk en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Journal of Artificial Organs en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Centrifugal blood pump en_US
dc.subject CFD en_US
dc.subject Hemolysis en_US
dc.subject Scalar shear stress en_US
dc.subject Mechanical Hemolysis en_US
dc.subject Flow en_US
dc.subject Prediction en_US
dc.subject Performance en_US
dc.title Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulating of the Fda Benchmark Blood Pump With Different Coefficient Sets and Scaler Shear Stress Models Used in the Power-Law Hemolysis Model en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.id ONDER, AHMET/0000-0001-8419-6896
gdc.author.institutional
gdc.author.scopusid 57222167697
gdc.author.scopusid 57224570636
gdc.author.scopusid 16044036400
gdc.author.wosid ONDER, AHMET/HMP-2944-2023
gdc.bip.impulseclass C5
gdc.bip.influenceclass C5
gdc.bip.popularityclass C4
gdc.coar.access metadata only access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.description.department KTÜN en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp [Onder, Ahmet] Konya Tech Univ, Tech Sci Vocat Sch, Mech & Met Technol Dept, Konya, Turkiye; [Incebay, Omer; Yapici, Rafet] Konya Tech Univ, Fac Engn & Nat Sci, Mech Engn Dept, Konya, Turkiye en_US
gdc.description.endpage 191
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q3
gdc.description.startpage 184
gdc.description.volume 28
gdc.description.wosquality Q3
gdc.identifier.openalex W4401820241
gdc.identifier.pmid 39177925
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:001296603700001
gdc.index.type WoS
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.index.type PubMed
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.impulse 2.0
gdc.oaire.influence 2.5916818E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen false
gdc.oaire.keywords United States Food and Drug Administration
gdc.oaire.keywords Hydrodynamics
gdc.oaire.keywords Models, Cardiovascular
gdc.oaire.keywords Humans
gdc.oaire.keywords Computer Simulation
gdc.oaire.keywords Stress, Mechanical
gdc.oaire.keywords Heart-Assist Devices
gdc.oaire.keywords Equipment Design
gdc.oaire.keywords Hemolysis
gdc.oaire.keywords United States
gdc.oaire.popularity 3.8873815E-9
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.openalex.collaboration National
gdc.openalex.fwci 1.10257789
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.69
gdc.opencitations.count 0
gdc.plumx.crossrefcites 1
gdc.plumx.mendeley 8
gdc.plumx.pubmedcites 1
gdc.plumx.scopuscites 3
gdc.scopus.citedcount 2
gdc.virtual.author İncebay, Ömer
gdc.virtual.author Yapıcı, Rafet
gdc.virtual.author Önder, Ahmet
gdc.wos.citedcount 1
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 700f7e37-116f-466d-9c1b-aa8ae97b27ce
relation.isAuthorOfPublication e2e5730a-9fdf-40e4-9644-225b3fbdd8fc
relation.isAuthorOfPublication dd6e2506-d781-4976-9df6-9bc627e72ec3
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 700f7e37-116f-466d-9c1b-aa8ae97b27ce

Files