Comparative Regression Analysis for Estimating Resonant Frequency of C-Like Patch Antennas

Loading...

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Open Access Color

GOLD

Green Open Access

Yes

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Publicly Funded

No
Impulse
Top 10%
Influence
Top 10%
Popularity
Top 10%

relationships.isProjectOf

relationships.isJournalIssueOf

Abstract

This study provides a comparative analysis of regression techniques to estimate the operating frequency of the C-like microstrip antenna. The performance of well-known regression techniques such as linear regression (LR), regression tree (RT), support vector regression (SVR), Gaussian regression (GR), and artificial neural network (ANN) is tested. For this purpose, 160 C-like microstrip antennas are simulated, of which 145 are used for training of regression techniques and 15 for testing. From the evaluated results, it is found that the pure quadratic Gaussian regression (PQGR) technique has the lowest error rates with 0.0109 mean absolute error (MAE), 0.0087 median error (ME), 0.0002 mean squared error (MSE), 0.0156 root mean squared error (RMSE), and 0.5981 average percentage error (APE). As can be seen in the comparative analysis, the PQGR method outperforms other regression methods on simulation and measurement data. Experimental analysis shows that the resonant frequency of the C-like patch antennas can be calculated very close to measurements.

Description

Keywords

Experimental analysis, Errors, Comparative analysis, Support vector regression (SVR), Mean square error, Simulations and measurements, Natural frequencies, Support vector regression, Slot antennas, Microstrip antennas, Root mean squared errors, Gaussian regression, Mean absolute error, Neural networks, Regression techniques

Fields of Science

0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, 02 engineering and technology

Citation

WoS Q

Scopus Q

OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
9

Volume

2021

Issue

Start Page

1

End Page

8
PlumX Metrics
Citations

Scopus : 9

Captures

Mendeley Readers : 8

SCOPUS™ Citations

8

checked on Jul 17, 2026

Web of Science™ Citations

5

checked on Jul 17, 2026

Downloads

15

checked on Jul 17, 2026

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
10.68

Sustainable Development Goals

SDG data is not available