Comparison Between Ssa and Sso Algorithm Inspired in the Behavior of the Social Spider for Constrained Optimization
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2021
Authors
Baş, Emine
Ülker, Erkan
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
SPRINGER
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
The heuristic algorithms are often used to find solutions to real complex world problems. In this paper, the Social Spider Algorithm (SSA) and Social Spider Optimization (SSO) which are heuristic algorithms created upon spider behaviors are considered. Performances of both algorithms are compared with each other from six different items. These are; fitness values of spider population which are obtained in different dimensions, number of candidate solution obtained in each iteration, the best value of candidate solutions obtained in each iteration, the worst value of candidate solutions obtained in each iteration, average fitness value of candidate solutions obtained in each iteration and running time of each iteration. Obtained results of SSA and SSO are applied to the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Various unimodal, multimodal, and hybrid standard benchmark functions are studied to compare each other with the performance of SSO and SSA. Using these benchmark functions, performances of SSO and SSA are compared with well-known evolutionary and recently developed methods in the literature. Obtained results show that both heuristic algorithms have advantages to another from different aspects. Also, according to other algorithms have good performance.
Description
ORCID
Keywords
Constrained Optimization, Heuristic, Social Spider, Spider Web, Ssa, Sso, Evolution Algorithm, Selection
Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL
Fields of Science
0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, 02 engineering and technology
Citation
WoS Q
Q1
Scopus Q
Q1

OpenCitations Citation Count
6
Source
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW
Volume
54
Issue
7
Start Page
5583
End Page
5631
PlumX Metrics
Citations
Scopus : 8
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 3
SCOPUS™ Citations
8
checked on Feb 03, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
1
checked on Feb 03, 2026
Google Scholar™


