An Experimental Study on the Effects of Various Drill Types on Drilling Performance of Gfrp Composite Pipes and Damage Formation

dc.contributor.author Gemi, Lokman
dc.contributor.author Morkavuk, Sezer
dc.contributor.author Köklü, Uğur
dc.contributor.author Gemi, Dilek Soylu
dc.date.accessioned 2021-12-13T10:29:44Z
dc.date.available 2021-12-13T10:29:44Z
dc.date.issued 2019
dc.description.abstract Drilling is the most commonly used machining operation among others for assembly applications. The necessity of this operation has come to the forefront in composite materials that are becoming widespread nowadays. In this study, drilling performance of glass fiber reinforced plastic (GFRP) composite pipes used in many sectors such as natural gas transmission lines, pressurized sewer lines, industrial waste transmission, defense industry, and construction industry was investigated. The GFRP pipe was produced by filament winding method with a winding angle of +/-55 degrees. Different drill types (conventional twist drill, brad and spur drill, and brad center drill) with a drill diameter of 4 mm were utilized for drilling the pipe and the effect of drill type on the drilling performance was investigated. Drilling tests were performed at a constant 5000 rpm spindle speed and six different feed rate parameters (25, 75, 125, 175, 225, and 275 mm/min). Thrust forces generated during drilling were recorded and after the drilling operations, hole exit surface damage, and borehole surface damage were examined by a digital microscope and scanning electron microscope (SEM). Results showed that the brad center drill produced lower thrust forces while the twist drill generated higher thrust forces. The severity of damages could vary depending on the tool geometry and feed rate. Especially, at lower feed rates, conventional twist drill results with increased delamination and uncut fibers as compared with other drills. The brad center drill presents better performance since it generates fewer damages. Also, it is observed that these damages formed in the winding angle direction (orientation). en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.05.023
dc.identifier.issn 1359-8368
dc.identifier.issn 1879-1069
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85066112227
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.05.023
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13091/613
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher ELSEVIER SCI LTD en_US
dc.relation.ispartof COMPOSITES PART B-ENGINEERING en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Composite Pipe en_US
dc.subject Damage Analysis en_US
dc.subject Damage Modes en_US
dc.subject Drilling en_US
dc.subject Filament Winding en_US
dc.subject Gfrp Pipe en_US
dc.subject Machinability en_US
dc.subject Velocity Impact Response en_US
dc.subject Filament-Wound Pipes en_US
dc.subject Fatigue Failure Behavior en_US
dc.subject Tool Geometry en_US
dc.subject Thrust Force en_US
dc.subject Machining Parameters en_US
dc.subject Induced Delamination en_US
dc.subject Fracture-Toughness en_US
dc.subject Internal-Pressure en_US
dc.subject Dynamic-Response en_US
dc.title An Experimental Study on the Effects of Various Drill Types on Drilling Performance of Gfrp Composite Pipes and Damage Formation en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.id Morkavuk, Sezer/0000-0002-6271-0804
gdc.author.scopusid 57201784328
gdc.author.scopusid 57191195867
gdc.author.scopusid 35345218800
gdc.author.scopusid 57202059169
gdc.author.wosid Morkavuk, Sezer/ABF-4563-2020
gdc.author.wosid Gemi, Lokman/AAD-2271-2020
gdc.author.wosid Koklu, Ugur/AAQ-1387-2020
gdc.bip.impulseclass C3
gdc.bip.influenceclass C4
gdc.bip.popularityclass C3
gdc.coar.access metadata only access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.description.department Fakülteler, Mühendislik ve Doğa Bilimleri Fakültesi, Makine Mühendisliği Bölümü en_US
gdc.description.endpage 194 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q1
gdc.description.startpage 186 en_US
gdc.description.volume 172 en_US
gdc.description.wosquality Q1
gdc.identifier.openalex W2944277626
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:000482513400021
gdc.index.type WoS
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.impulse 60.0
gdc.oaire.influence 7.8058635E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen false
gdc.oaire.popularity 8.6794635E-8
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 0205 materials engineering
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 02 engineering and technology
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 0210 nano-technology
gdc.openalex.collaboration National
gdc.openalex.fwci 10.24633756
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.99
gdc.openalex.toppercent TOP 1%
gdc.opencitations.count 115
gdc.plumx.crossrefcites 1
gdc.plumx.mendeley 116
gdc.plumx.scopuscites 130
gdc.scopus.citedcount 130
gdc.wos.citedcount 121

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
1-s2.0-S1359836818342902-main.pdf
Size:
3.52 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format