Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13091/920
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKorkmaz, Serra Zerrin-
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-13T10:32:10Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-13T10:32:10Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.issn2147-9380-
dc.identifier.issn2147-9380-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2019.98-
dc.identifier.urihttps://app.trdizin.gov.tr/makale/TXpnMU1qa3lNZz09-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13091/920-
dc.description.abstractArchitectural design decisions play an important role in the earthquake behavior of buildings. However, architects are very unfamiliar with earthquake response concept. Earthquake resistant design (ERD) initiates generally during the architectural design stage to adhere to these principles. This study was focused on plan geometries, architectural design and structural system configurations for structural earthquake responses. A general-purpose finite element program was used to evaluate several irregularities and their corresponding earthquake responses. In the first phase of the study, the projections in plan view and projection ratios were compared from a torsional response perspective. In the second phase, nonparallel axes are investigated. In the last phase, the effects of shear wall arrangement on torsional irregularity response were analysed by considering 4 different configurations in a school building failure during the recent earthquake (2011) in the city, Van located in the east of Turkey. The number of storys was chosen as a parameter for the latter phase. The mode superposition method was preferred for the linear dynamic analyses. According to the results of the study, the torsional rotation was found to be proportional to the projection ratio in plan. For non-orthogonal cases, structure with an inclined axis more than 30°, torsional irregularity factor exceeded the code-defined limit. Beneficial observations and conclusions were drawn for both architects and structural engineers’ perspective.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planningen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.titleSeismic Design Considerations for Architectural Design Aspectsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.15320/ICONARP.2019.98-
dc.departmentFakülteler, Mimarlık ve Tasarım Fakültesi, Mimarlık Bölümüen_US
dc.identifier.volume7en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage568en_US
dc.identifier.endpage591en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000504910700010en_US
dc.institutionauthorKorkmaz, Serra Zerrin-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid385292en_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.dept04.01. Department of Architecture-
Appears in Collections:ICONARP - International Journal of Architecture and Planning
Mimarlık ve Tasarım Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
TR Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / TR Dizin Indexed Publications Collections
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collections
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
d692f938-e514-40e6-bcb3-db9613160538.pdf1.59 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

116
checked on May 13, 2024

Download(s)

164
checked on May 13, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.