Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13091/830
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKazar, Gülüstan Kılınç-
dc.contributor.authorKarabörk, Hakan-
dc.contributor.authorMakineci, Hasan Bilgehan-
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-13T10:32:03Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-13T10:32:03Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.issn0255-660X-
dc.identifier.issn0974-3006-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-021-01454-y-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13091/830-
dc.description.abstractUnmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), which have made a name for themselves in photogrammetry studies in recent years, provide users with integrated camera systems. Identifying interior orientation parameters, such as focal coordinates, focal length and distortions, is an essential requirement for camera systems used for photogrammetric purposes. This process, which is called camera calibration, is offered automatically by software from the library. Another important known calibration method is self-calibration. Calibrating cameras by creating 2D or 3D test areas is a troublesome and grueling option. However, it is the most commonly accepted way in terms of accuracy. In this study, images were taken in different test areas (2D and 3D) to perform the calibrations of the cameras integrated on two different UAVs, namely DJI Phantom 4 Pro and Parrot Anafi. The calibration parameters determined from the images taken were compared with the calibration parameters obtained by the self-calibration method, and block adjustment was performed with ground control points marked in the study area. In order to perform performance analysis, the root-mean-square error (RMSE) was determined from the control points. In conclusion, it was determined that the results of both the calibrations obtained with the test fields and those obtained with self-calibration were acceptable.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSPRINGERen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF THE INDIAN SOCIETY OF REMOTE SENSINGen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectInterior orientationen_US
dc.subjectNon-metric camera calibrationen_US
dc.subjectSelf-calibrationen_US
dc.subjectUAVen_US
dc.subject2Den_US
dc.subject3D camera calibrationen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of Test Field-based Calibration and Self-calibration Models of UAV Integrated Compact Camerasen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12524-021-01454-y-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85118618006en_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Mühendislik ve Doğa Bilimleri Fakültesi, Harita Mühendisliği Bölümüen_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000715689500001en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.authorscopusid57326332900-
dc.authorscopusid24921546500-
dc.authorscopusid57191188477-
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2-
item.grantfulltextembargo_20300101-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.dept02.08. Department of Geomatic Engineering-
crisitem.author.dept02.08. Department of Geomatic Engineering-
Appears in Collections:Mühendislik ve Doğa Bilimleri Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collections
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collections
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
KılınçKazar2022_Article_EvaluationOfTestField-basedCal.pdf
  Until 2030-01-01
1.22 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

1
checked on Apr 27, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

2
checked on Apr 27, 2024

Page view(s)

162
checked on Apr 29, 2024

Download(s)

6
checked on Apr 29, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.