Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13091/830
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kazar, Gülüstan Kılınç | - |
dc.contributor.author | Karabörk, Hakan | - |
dc.contributor.author | Makineci, Hasan Bilgehan | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-12-13T10:32:03Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-12-13T10:32:03Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0255-660X | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0974-3006 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-021-01454-y | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13091/830 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), which have made a name for themselves in photogrammetry studies in recent years, provide users with integrated camera systems. Identifying interior orientation parameters, such as focal coordinates, focal length and distortions, is an essential requirement for camera systems used for photogrammetric purposes. This process, which is called camera calibration, is offered automatically by software from the library. Another important known calibration method is self-calibration. Calibrating cameras by creating 2D or 3D test areas is a troublesome and grueling option. However, it is the most commonly accepted way in terms of accuracy. In this study, images were taken in different test areas (2D and 3D) to perform the calibrations of the cameras integrated on two different UAVs, namely DJI Phantom 4 Pro and Parrot Anafi. The calibration parameters determined from the images taken were compared with the calibration parameters obtained by the self-calibration method, and block adjustment was performed with ground control points marked in the study area. In order to perform performance analysis, the root-mean-square error (RMSE) was determined from the control points. In conclusion, it was determined that the results of both the calibrations obtained with the test fields and those obtained with self-calibration were acceptable. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | SPRINGER | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | JOURNAL OF THE INDIAN SOCIETY OF REMOTE SENSING | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Interior orientation | en_US |
dc.subject | Non-metric camera calibration | en_US |
dc.subject | Self-calibration | en_US |
dc.subject | UAV | en_US |
dc.subject | 2D | en_US |
dc.subject | 3D camera calibration | en_US |
dc.title | Evaluation of Test Field-based Calibration and Self-calibration Models of UAV Integrated Compact Cameras | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s12524-021-01454-y | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85118618006 | en_US |
dc.department | Fakülteler, Mühendislik ve Doğa Bilimleri Fakültesi, Harita Mühendisliği Bölümü | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000715689500001 | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.authorscopusid | 57326332900 | - |
dc.authorscopusid | 24921546500 | - |
dc.authorscopusid | 57191188477 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q2 | - |
item.grantfulltext | embargo_20300101 | - |
item.openairetype | Article | - |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
item.languageiso639-1 | en | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
crisitem.author.dept | 02.08. Department of Geomatic Engineering | - |
crisitem.author.dept | 02.08. Department of Geomatic Engineering | - |
Appears in Collections: | Mühendislik ve Doğa Bilimleri Fakültesi Koleksiyonu Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collections WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collections |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
KılınçKazar2022_Article_EvaluationOfTestField-basedCal.pdf Until 2030-01-01 | 1.22 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
1
checked on Apr 27, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
2
checked on Apr 27, 2024
Page view(s)
162
checked on Apr 29, 2024
Download(s)
6
checked on Apr 29, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.