Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13091/753
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Janus, Jaroslaw | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ertunç, Ela | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-12-13T10:29:55Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-12-13T10:29:55Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0264-8377 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1873-5754 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lusepol.2021.105542 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13091/753 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Land fragmentation is a primary cause of low agricultural profitability in many regions of the world. Adverse fragmentation parameters can be improved with land consolidation projects. Such projects are undertaken in areas characterised by different initial parameters of land fragmentation, types of agriculture, sociocultural conditions, and legislation that provides the framework for their formal and procedural implementation. All these aspects should affect not only the effectiveness of the projects but also how they are evaluated depending on the local circumstances. The paper presents results of the assessment of identified differences in land consolidation project effectiveness in the context of legal and sociocultural conditions. The research involved eight land consolidation projects carried out in Poland and Turkey. The countries have similar structures of agriculture and are conducting ongoing, long-term land consolidation schemes. The results are indicative of the necessity to differentiate assessment criteria depending on the location of a project and its primary goal. The application of popular land fragmentation indices could, in particular, lead to incorrect assessment of whether a project was successful when it was not intended to result in a significant increase in parcel area and reduction of the number of parcels. The research shows that it is possible to compare the effectiveness of projects from different countries provided that the process takes into consideration differences in local conditions affecting the development of agriculture and legislation. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | TUBITAK 2219-International Postdoctoral Research Fellowship ProgramTurkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Arastirma Kurumu (TUBITAK) | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | This article is one of the results of the study conducted by the second author at the Department of Agricultural Land Surveying, Cadastre and Photogrammetry in University of Agriculture in Krakow with the support of TUBITAK 2219-International Postdoctoral Research Fellowship Program. We thank both organisations for their support. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | ELSEVIER SCI LTD | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | LAND USE POLICY | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Land Consolidation | en_US |
dc.subject | Turkey | en_US |
dc.subject | Poland | en_US |
dc.subject | Land Fragmentation | en_US |
dc.subject | Effectiveness | en_US |
dc.subject | Parcel Fragmentation | en_US |
dc.subject | Farmers Satisfaction | en_US |
dc.subject | Reallocation | en_US |
dc.subject | Ownership | en_US |
dc.subject | Impacts | en_US |
dc.subject | Areas | en_US |
dc.subject | Size | en_US |
dc.subject | Agriculture | en_US |
dc.subject | Perceptions | en_US |
dc.subject | Performance | en_US |
dc.title | Differences in the effectiveness of land consolidation projects in various countries and their causes: Examples of Poland and Turkey | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.lusepol.2021.105542 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85106946619 | en_US |
dc.department | Fakülteler, Mühendislik ve Doğa Bilimleri Fakültesi, Harita Mühendisliği Bölümü | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 108 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000689594300009 | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q1 | - |
item.grantfulltext | embargo_20300101 | - |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
item.languageiso639-1 | en | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
item.openairetype | Article | - |
crisitem.author.dept | 02.08. Department of Geomatic Engineering | - |
Appears in Collections: | Mühendislik ve Doğa Bilimleri Fakültesi Koleksiyonu Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collections WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collections |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
1-s2.0-S0264837721002659-main.pdf Until 2030-01-01 | 5.42 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
CORE Recommender
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
13
checked on May 4, 2024
Page view(s)
74
checked on May 6, 2024
Download(s)
6
checked on May 6, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.