Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13091/70
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAksoylu, Ceyhun-
dc.contributor.authorMobark, Ahmed-
dc.contributor.authorArslan, Musa Hakan-
dc.contributor.authorErkan, İbrahim Hakkı-
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-13T10:19:43Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-13T10:19:43Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.issn0718-915X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.7764/RDLC.19.2.282-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13091/70-
dc.description.abstractDoctrines of earthquakes and also the latest approaches of earthquake resistant building design in standards need to be revised periodically. While the revisions and updates in the American standards occur over periods of three or five years including limited subjects, in Turkey the same revisions are done once over long periods including the whole subjects of the standards. As examples the standards of 1975, 1998, 2007 and finally 2018 could be given. Especially, in 2018 standard (TBEC-2018) many changes were made over concepts and criteria. The procedure of calculating the earthquake loads in 2018 standards is similar to the one in the American standards of (ASCE-7- 16), however for the element design the changes are shown as developments over the one of 2007 earthquake standard (TEC-2007). The changes made by 2018 standard for calculations of earthquake loads and their effects on civil engineering are very important factors of new building design. The earthquake load affecting a building which is the first factor of earthquake resistant building design shows important differences according to the condition changes in the standard. Based on this motivation in this study reinforced concrete frame type buildings of different elevations were researched by using ETABS (structural software for building analysis and design) according to linear equivalent seismic load method. According to the analysis results of the chosen buildings, a comparison forthe base shear force, top displacement and relative story displacement between TEC-2007, TBEC-2018 and ASCE 7-16 standards was carried out. From the analysis results, it is found that for most of the soil classes while the maximum base shear forces in 3 and 5- story buildings are achievedat TEC-2007, the maximum base shear forces in 7 and 9- story buildings are achieved at TBEC-2018. Also, it is predicted that the higher increment in the design forces of buildings with higher elevations is obtained at TBEC-2018 for strong soils, and at TEC-2007 for weak soils. By considering cracked sections at TBEC-2018 the calculations displacement and period was affected as periods in TBEC-2018 were increased by almost 34% respected to TEC-2007. The same increment ratio was determined for ASCE 7-16 as 45%. Also, as a response for the increments in period, the spectral acceleration determined from the elastic spectrum diagram was decreased. At the end of the study, nonlinear performance analysis was also performed and performance points were determined according to the demand spectra of the seismic codes. ASCE's demand displacement values are in any case lower than Turkish codes. TBEC-2018 reveals less displacement demands in high-rise buildings than TEC-2007. The closest results for the three regulations occurred on the softest grounds.According to the results obtained from the static pushover analysis, a ductile behavior occurred in all of the structural systems and plastic hinge mechanism started from the beams firstly.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPONTIFICIA UNIV CATOLICA CHILE, ESCUELA CONSTRUCCION CIVILen_US
dc.relation.ispartofREVISTA DE LA CONSTRUCCIONen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAsce 7-16en_US
dc.subjectTbec-2018en_US
dc.subjectTec-2007en_US
dc.subjectEarthquake Standarden_US
dc.subjectSeismic Forceen_US
dc.subjectSeismic Performanceen_US
dc.subjectDesignen_US
dc.subjectEarthquakeen_US
dc.subjectDamageen_US
dc.titleA comparative study on ASCE 7-16, TBEC-2018 and TEC-2007 for reinforced concrete buildingsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.7764/RDLC.19.2.282-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85091488895en_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Mühendislik ve Doğa Bilimleri Fakültesi, İnşaat Mühendisliği Bölümüen_US
dc.authoridAKSOYLU, Ceyhun/0000-0002-1574-4251-
dc.authorwosidAKSOYLU, Ceyhun/AAQ-1447-2020-
dc.identifier.volume19en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage282en_US
dc.identifier.endpage305en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000579018900010en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.authorscopusid57193686945-
dc.authorscopusid57219163163-
dc.authorscopusid11940766700-
dc.authorscopusid55609015200-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextembargo_20300101-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.author.dept02.02. Department of Civil Engineering-
crisitem.author.dept02.02. Department of Civil Engineering-
crisitem.author.dept02.02. Department of Civil Engineering-
Appears in Collections:Mühendislik ve Doğa Bilimleri Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collections
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collections
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fbe801cbac927e705c686ac038eae22607df.pdf
  Until 2030-01-01
1.34 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

9
checked on Mar 23, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

17
checked on Mar 23, 2024

Page view(s)

178
checked on Mar 25, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.