Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13091/5125
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAksoy, Muharrem Hilmi-
dc.contributor.authorİspir, Murat-
dc.contributor.authorYeşil, Emin-
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-16T14:42:19Z-
dc.date.available2024-02-16T14:42:19Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.issn1302-0900-
dc.identifier.issn2147-9429-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.2339/politeknik.1260228-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13091/5125-
dc.description.abstractThe optimum tilt angle for a photovoltaic (PV) system depends on the row spacing because it affects the amount of shading on the panels. This study modeled PV systems for four different panel row spacings of 2 m, 2.5 m, 3 m, and 4 m in a fixed 3000 m2 area in Konya province, Turkey. For different panel row spacings, the system performances were compared using a constant tilt angle of 35 degrees, expressed as a proper angle for PV installations at the considered location. In addition, the optimum tilt angle is found for four different cases in terms of electricity generation. In systems with 35 degrees tilt angles at electricity were produced annually as 622.77 MWh, 566.49 MWh, 495.36 MWh, and 385.72 MWh, respectively, for panel row spacings of 2 m, 2.5 m, 3 m, and 4 m. In addition, these electricity productions are 6.19%, 4.41%, 2.56%, and 0.92% higher with optimum tilt angles as 1 degrees, 15 degrees, 21 degrees and 27 degrees. Similarly, the Performance Ratio (PR) values obtained with the optimum angles are 20.61%, 8.39%, 4.12%, and 1.44%, higher than the fixed tilt angle cases. According to the economic analysis, systems with a fixed tilt angle for these panel row spacings pay back themselves in 5.13, 4.67, 4.44, and 4.28 years, respectively, while systems at optimum angles pay back themselves in a shorter time by 5.83%, 4.26%, 2.49%, and 0.91%. Furthermore, the highest NPV/INV, IRR, and ROI values were obtained from the system with 3 m panel row spacing with the optimum tilt angle of 21 degrees as 0.915, 20.42%, and 91.57%, respectively, which is techno economically found to be the most feasible case.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherGazi Univen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Polytechnic-Politeknik Dergisien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjecteconomic analysisen_US
dc.subjectphotovoltaic panelen_US
dc.subjectpanel row spacingen_US
dc.subjectshading lossesen_US
dc.subjecttilt angleen_US
dc.subjectPower-Planten_US
dc.subjectEnergyen_US
dc.subjectSoftwareen_US
dc.titleImpact of tilt angle on the performance of the photovoltaic systems for different row spacingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2339/politeknik.1260228-
dc.departmentKTÜNen_US
dc.identifier.volume26en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001152006100002en_US
dc.institutionauthor-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.dept02.10. Department of Mechanical Engineering-
Appears in Collections:WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collections
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

16
checked on May 13, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.