Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13091/4654
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorÖğütcü, Sermet-
dc.contributor.authorAlçay, Salih-
dc.contributor.authorDuman, Hüseyin-
dc.contributor.authorÖzdemir, Behlül Numan-
dc.contributor.authorKoray, Ülkünur-
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-02T11:17:37Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-02T11:17:37Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.issn2667-8055-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.36306/konjes.1268932-
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/1195890-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13091/4654-
dc.description.abstractThanks to the rapidly emerging low-cost dual-frequency GNSS receivers, a feasible alternative for geodetic-grade GNSS receivers became available for some GNSS applications. In this study, the performance of data integrity and quality of a low-cost ZED-F9P u-blox GNSS receiver was investigated by comparing it with a geodetic-grade GNSS receiver. Availability of the epoch and phase/code signal channels, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), code multipath, and cycle slips were analyzed for the geodetic-grade and low-cost ZED-F9P u-blox GNSS receivers. One month’s data of GPS, GLONASS, and Galileo constellations were analysed using the RINEX files of the receivers. The results showed that the epoch availability of the geodetic-grade and u-blox GNSS receiver is comparable to each other, while the availability of phase/code signal channels of the geodetic-grade receiver is higher than the u-blox receiver. In terms of data quality, SNR values from both receivers are comparable, while the multipath level of the u-blox GNSS receiver is significantly higher than the geodetic-grade one. The results also showed that the number of cycle slips of the u-blox receiver is significantly higher than the geodetic-one.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofKonya mühendislik bilimleri dergisi (Online)en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.titleData Integrity and Quality Analysis of Low Cost Zed-F9p U-Blox Gnss Receiveren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.36306/konjes.1268932-
dc.departmentKTÜNen_US
dc.identifier.volume11en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage660en_US
dc.identifier.endpage667en_US
dc.institutionauthor-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid1195890en_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.dept02.08. Department of Geomatic Engineering-
Appears in Collections:TR Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / TR Dizin Indexed Publications Collections
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
10.36306-konjes.1268932-3026786.pdf816.35 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

32
checked on May 13, 2024

Download(s)

16
checked on May 13, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.