Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13091/4128
Title: Adrenal lesion classification with abdomen caps and the effect of ROI size
Authors: Solak, Ahmet
Ceylan, Rahime
Bozkurt, Mustafa Alper
Cebeci, Hakan
Koplay, Mustafa
Keywords: Adrenal lesion
Classification
Capsule network
Deep learning
Publisher: Springer
Abstract: Accurate classification of adrenal lesions on magnetic resonance (MR) images are very important for diagnosis and treatment planning. The detection and classification of lesions in medical imaging heavily rely on several key factors, including the specialist's level of experience, work intensity, and fatigue of the clinician. These factors are critical determinants of the accuracy and effectiveness of the diagnostic process, which in turn has a direct impact on patient health outcomes. With the spread of artificial intelligence, the use of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems in disease diagnosis has also increased. In this study, adrenal lesion classification was performed using deep learning on MR images. The data set used was obtained from the Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Selcuk University, and all adrenal lesions were identified and reviewed in consensus by two radiologists experienced with abdominal MR. Studies were carried out on two different data sets created by T1- and T2-weighted MR images. The data set consisted of 112 benign and 10 malignant lesions for each mode. Experiments were performed with regions of interest (ROIs) of different sizes to increase the working performance. Thus, the effect of the selected ROI size on the classification performance was assessed. In addition, instead of the convolutional neural network (CNN) models used in deep learning, a unique classification model structure called Abdomen Caps was proposed. When the data sets used in classification studies are manually separated for training, validation, and testing, different results are obtained with different data sets for each stage. To eliminate this imbalance, tenfold cross-validation was used in this study. The best results obtained were 0.982, 0.999, 0.969, 0.983, 0.998, and 0.964 for accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, area under the curve (AUC) score, and kappa score, respectively.
URI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-023-01259-y
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13091/4128
ISSN: 2662-4729
2662-4737
Appears in Collections:PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collections
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collections
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collections

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
s13246-023-01259-y.pdf
  Until 2030-01-01
1.26 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show full item record



CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

34
checked on Apr 22, 2024

Download(s)

2
checked on Apr 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.