Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13091/4063
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAksoy, Muharrem Hilmi-
dc.contributor.authorIspir, Murat-
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-30T21:09:04Z-
dc.date.available2023-05-30T21:09:04Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.issn2466-4677-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.18485/aeletters.2023.8.1.1-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13091/4063-
dc.description.abstractThis study modeled monocrystalline (mono-Si), polycrystalline (poly-Si), and amorphous silicon (a-Si) Photovoltaic (PV) systems with a 300 kWp installed power using PVsyst software in Konya province, Turkey. The system’s electricity generation was calculated and compared with different PV technologies. In addition, an economic analysis for a 25 year lifespan was made with the obtained data. The annual global horizontal radiation (GI) and effective global irradiation (GE) are found to be 2001.7 kWh/m² and 1949.6 kWh/m², respectively. The highest yearly total electricity production was obtained from mono-Si, with a value of 513.91 MWh. This value is 1.91% and 3.07% higher than poly-Si and a-Si, respectively. Since the Performance Ratio (PR) values are proportional to the generated electricity and incoming irradiation to the surface of the PV panels, it calculated 0.853, 0.847, and 0.830 for mono-Si, poly-Si, and a-Si, respectively. According to the basic payback method, the economic analysis showed that mono-Si and poly-Si pay off in about 5.8-5.9 years, while a-Si pays off in 9,1 years. A net profit of $1.5 million, $1.45 million, and $1.1 million was obtained from mono-Si, poly-Si, and a-Si, respectively. It was concluded that the ratio of income values to investment cost was 253%, 244.77%, and 126.6%, respectively. Therefore, it was concluded that mono-Si and poly-Si are economically quite feasible for small and medium-scale PV systems, but a-Si is still not feasible due to lower efficiency and higher costs. © 2023 Published by the Serbian Academic Center.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSerbian Academic Centeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofApplied Engineering Lettersen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAmorphous siliconen_US
dc.subjecteconomic analysisen_US
dc.subjectmonocrystallineen_US
dc.subjectpolycrystallineen_US
dc.subjectPVsysten_US
dc.titleTechno-Economic Feasibility of Different Photovoltaic Technologiesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.18485/aeletters.2023.8.1.1-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85153350740en_US
dc.departmentKTÜNen_US
dc.identifier.volume8en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1en_US
dc.identifier.endpage9en_US
dc.institutionauthor-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.authorscopusid55823803400-
dc.authorscopusid58193831500-
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4-
dc.ktun-updatektunupdateen_US
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeArticle-
crisitem.author.dept02.10. Department of Mechanical Engineering-
Appears in Collections:Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collections
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
aeletters-2023-8-1-1.pdf1.04 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

606
checked on May 6, 2024

Download(s)

226
checked on May 6, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.