Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13091/2766
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYılmaz, Nazende-
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-15T17:39:05Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-15T17:39:05Z-
dc.date.issued2020-10-15-
dc.identifier.urihttps://iconarch.ktun.edu.tr/index.php/iconarch/article/view/292/254-
dc.identifier.urihttps://iconarch.ktun.edu.tr/index.php/iconarch/article/view/292-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13091/2766-
dc.description292en_US
dc.descriptioniconarch:S7en_US
dc.description.abstractNeeds and beliefs are the leading elements of architecture. A dome giving a building a stupendous appearance has a stronger effect on people compared to other covering systems when considered in terms of inner volume. Due to this strong impression, dome has frequently been preferred as the top cover of religious buildings throughout history. Examining the background of this preference based on religious tradition can reveal the purpose of building a dome and what it stands for in society. For this reason, primarily the symbolism of dome in the world will be discussed and the representation and hermeneutic understandings of dome in Ottoman culture will be addressed through architectural, literary and religious texts expressing ontological perception in the study. The development of dome structure in Islamic architecture can be traced starting from the Great Seljuk constructions. The notion of a central dome gained prevalence in the early Ottoman period before the conquest of Istanbul. The dome of the Hagia Sophia was a goal to be accomplished for Mimar Sinan (Architect Sinan), who carried dome architecture to its zenith. While this goal is often perceived as the ideal of building the largest dome covering a large rectangular space, it has the idea of making a higher version of a symbolic volume behind it. In order to address this subject, it is necessary to evaluate the architectural texts describing the symbolism of dome and its hierarchy within the structure. Starting from the symbolic expressions and analogies in these texts, examining the religious ontological texts which will explain the subject in more detail will allow for a better hermeneutic understanding of the dome in Ottoman culture.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherKonya Technical University Faculty of Architecture and Designen_US
dc.relation.ispartofICONARCH International Congress of Architecture and Planning; 2020: ICONARCH IV - Space and Process in Architecture and Planningen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectOttoman Architectureen_US
dc.subjectDome Spaceen_US
dc.subjectHermeneuticsen_US
dc.subjectArchitectural Symbolismen_US
dc.subjectOntologyen_US
dc.titleHermeneutics of Dome Space in Ottoman Architectureen_US
dc.typeConference Objecten_US
dc.identifier.volumeICONARCH IVen_US
dc.identifier.startpage791en_US
dc.identifier.endpage819en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKonferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Başka Kurum Yazarıen_US
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypeConference Object-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:ICONARCH - International Congress of Architecture and Planning
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
document - 2023-03-22T112706.059.pdf11.25 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

126
checked on Apr 29, 2024

Download(s)

34
checked on Apr 29, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check





Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.