Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13091/2562
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKorkmaz, Cansuen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-12T10:48:01Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-12T10:48:01Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13091/2562-
dc.description.abstractAlthough neo-liberalism is not an urbanization policy, it has changed urban practices since 1970s. Neoliberal politics has started to use history, culture, identity, social status, even happiness as a commodity that can be bought and sold to ensure the sustainability of capital. Urban history and cultural heritage have been highlighted in urban spaces, themed projects, shopping malls, residents, and tourism facilities etc. Hereby, cultural heritages and culture have been faced with depreciation and conservation. Cities have transformed into a fragmented structure with replicas and city images are destroyed. In globalization process place that is a significant concept in terms of architecture and urban planning, has started to lose its distinctive character and lost its meaning. Neoliberalism has constituted “non-places” that defines as places which can be seen everywhere without socio-cultural connection. The difference of an area and space is to be identifiable not only spatial but also historical and relational. The case study area, Ecdad Park, is inspired by historical and architectural features of Ottoman and Selçuklu Empire and commodify urban history as a marketing tool. In scope of the research, the effects of commodification of urban history on users’ satisfaction is evaluated with “user satisfaction survey”. In the light of the results obtained from the survey, density of green areas, cleanness, proximity, security is more effective on user satisfaction rather than historical data and replicas of cultural heritage.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherGeographies Planning Tourism Studiosen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectNeoliberal Urbanismen_US
dc.subjectCommodificationen_US
dc.subjectNon-Placesen_US
dc.subjectPublic Spaceen_US
dc.subjectKonya Ecdad Parken_US
dc.titleNeoliberal Urbanism and Commodification of Urban History as a Marketing Tool in Public Recreationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5505/gpts.2021.58066-
dc.contributor.affiliationFakülteler, Mimarlık ve Tasarım Fakültesi, Şehir ve Bölge Planlama Bölümüen_US
dc.relation.issn2791-7460en_US
dc.description.volume1en_US
dc.description.issue2en_US
dc.description.startpage85en_US
dc.description.endpage96en_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Mimarlık ve Tasarım Fakültesi, Şehir ve Bölge Planlama Bölümüen_US
dc.authorid0000-0003-4570-1751en_US
dc.institutionauthorKorkmaz, Cansuen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.author.dept04.03. Department of Urban and Regional Planning-
Appears in Collections:Mimarlık ve Tasarım Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
GPT_1_2_85_96.pdf806.81 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

176
checked on Apr 22, 2024

Download(s)

100
checked on Apr 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.