Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13091/2443
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYazman, Şakir-
dc.contributor.authorAksoylu, Ceyhun-
dc.contributor.authorGemi, Lokman-
dc.contributor.authorArslan, Musa Hakan-
dc.contributor.authorHamad, Ahmed Abed-
dc.contributor.authorÖzkılıç, Yasin Onuralp-
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-23T20:22:44Z-
dc.date.available2022-05-23T20:22:44Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.issn2352-0124-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.03.046-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13091/2443-
dc.description.abstractStrengthening of shear deficient T-beams is not as easy as rectangular beams due to the presence of slabs. In this study, externally bonded reinforcement (EBR) such type of reinforced concrete shear deficient T-beams with and without anchorage in different CFRP configurations was experimentally and analytically investigated. Pursuant to this goal, nine half-scale T-beams were produced and tested with monotonic loading under four points. Seven of these T-beams are strengthened with partial CFRP strip and one is strengthened with full CFRP wrapped in the shear span. The failures of strengthened beams are initiated with the debonding failure of FRP sheets followed by brittle shear failure. In order to prevent this failure, two specimens with partial CFRP strip are fixed to the beam by using anchors at different angles of 45 and 90. The experimental results indicated that the contribution of EBR to the shear capacity is significant and depends on different variables such as anchorage angle, strengthening type. Moreover, the strengthening method that gives the most effective results in strengthening T-beams are full wrapping CFRP and partial CFRP with a 45-degree anchorage type. The anchorage application increased the shear capacity by 42.6%-53.8% compared to the reference specimens. In addition, the anchors with angle of 45 increased stiffness by 37%. In terms of ductility, the best result was given by the type of strengthening where the slabs were broken and the beam was completely wrapped. This method contributed 42%-80% more to ductility than other methods. The obtained experimental results were also compared with the empirical correlations given by ACI 440.2R-17, TBEC-2019 and FIB-2010 and recommendations are given. Especially in fully wrapped beams, the estimation of ACI was determined to be 96%. The estimations of the other codes are far from meeting the experimental results; therefore, essential improvements should be applied to the codes, especially with regard to CFRP deformation and approaches for anchored connections.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipKonya Technical University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit [:201004038]; Konya Technical Universityen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipAcknowledgements This study was supported by Konya Technical University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit (Project Number:201004038) . Authors also would like to thank Konya Technical University for their financial support.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Science Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofStructuresen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCFRPen_US
dc.subjectReinforced Concrete T-beamsen_US
dc.subjectStrengtheningen_US
dc.subjectAnalytical analysisen_US
dc.subjectAnchorageen_US
dc.subjectBuilding Codesen_US
dc.subjectDamage analysisen_US
dc.subjectRc Beamsen_US
dc.subjectFlexural Behavioren_US
dc.subjectDepth Ratioen_US
dc.subjectShearen_US
dc.subjectPerformanceen_US
dc.subjectPolymeren_US
dc.subjectCompositesen_US
dc.subjectDeficienten_US
dc.subjectSheetsen_US
dc.subjectJointsen_US
dc.titleARTICLE INFO Keywords: CFRP Reinforced Concrete T-beams Strengthening Analytical analysis Anchorage Building Codes Damage analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.istruc.2022.03.046-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85126947454en_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Mühendislik ve Doğa Bilimleri Fakültesi, İnşaat Mühendisliği Bölümüen_US
dc.authoridGemi, Lokman/0000-0002-9895-6574-
dc.authoridYazman, Şakir/0000-0002-4064-0024-
dc.authoridÖzkılıç, Yasin Onuralp/0000-0001-9354-4784-
dc.authoridAKSOYLU, Ceyhun/0000-0002-1574-4251-
dc.authorwosidGemi, Lokman/AAD-2271-2020-
dc.authorwosidYazman, Şakir/AAQ-1906-2020-
dc.authorwosidÖzkılıç, Yasin Onuralp/AAA-9279-2019-
dc.authorwosidAKSOYLU, Ceyhun/AAQ-1447-2020-
dc.identifier.volume39en_US
dc.identifier.startpage527en_US
dc.identifier.endpage542en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000788144900001en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextembargo_20300101-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.dept02.02. Department of Civil Engineering-
crisitem.author.dept02.02. Department of Civil Engineering-
Appears in Collections:Mühendislik ve Doğa Bilimleri Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collections
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collections
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S2352710222002583-main.pdf
  Until 2030-01-01
13.87 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

1
checked on Apr 13, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

49
checked on Apr 13, 2024

Page view(s)

164
checked on Apr 15, 2024

Download(s)

6
checked on Apr 15, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.