Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13091/1885
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKristjánsdóttir, Sigrí?ur-
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-26T20:52:43Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-26T20:52:43Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.issn2147-9380-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2019.79-
dc.identifier.urihttps://iconarp.ktun.edu.tr/index.php/iconarp/article/view/380-
dc.identifier.urihttps://iconarp.ktun.edu.tr/index.php/iconarp/article/view/380/205-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13091/1885-
dc.descriptioniconarpID: 380en_US
dc.descriptioniconarp:UMen_US
dc.description.abstractThis paper provides a comprehensive review of the research field of urban morphology: the study of urban form. Urban morphology is a growing field of cross-disciplinary research, attracting worldwide interest among scholars in architecture, geography and planning. It aims to decipher the physical form, the urban landscape or townscape of complex contemporary cities. This paper discusses the evolution of urban morphology, from its conceptual foundations in research on the physical form of urban areas. Interestingly, the roots of urban morphology can be traced back to different disciplines in different countries.  This discussion will cast light on various research perspectives of urban morphology, as well as discussing similarities and differences between the geographical and the architectural approaches to urban form studies. This is followed by a closer look at the theories developed by Gianfranco Caniggia and MRG Conzen. Their work has been an inspiration for many practitioners and researchers, including Whitehand, Maffei, and Moudon to name a few. Finally, a schematic diagram is presented, which reflects the heightened activity of research on physical form that is currently occurring in several disciplines simultaneously, and showing the relationships between research traditions and authors. As the formation and development of the urban landscape becomes ever more diverse, it is necessary to revisit and use the concepts and methods established by Caniggia and Conzen in the management of urban landscape changes.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherKonya Technical University Faculty of Architecture and Designen_US
dc.relation.ispartofICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planningen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectUrban Morphologyen_US
dc.subjectgeographical perspectiveen_US
dc.subjectarchitectural perspectiveen_US
dc.subjectCaniggiaen_US
dc.subjectConzenen_US
dc.subjectUrban Morphologyen_US
dc.titleRoots of Urban Morphologyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.15320/ICONARP.2019.79-
dc.departmentKTÜNen_US
dc.identifier.volume7en_US
dc.identifier.issueSPECIAL ISSUE "URBAN MORPHOLOGY"en_US
dc.identifier.startpage15en_US
dc.identifier.endpage36en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Başka Kurum Yazarıen_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:ICONARP - International Journal of Architecture and Planning
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
document (13).pdf726.45 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

28
checked on May 27, 2024

Download(s)

20
checked on May 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.