Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13091/1834
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorŞensoy, Gamze-
dc.contributor.authorÜstün, Berna-
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-26T20:51:06Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-26T20:51:06Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.issn2147-9380-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2018.44-
dc.identifier.urihttps://iconarp.ktun.edu.tr/index.php/iconarp/article/view/188-
dc.identifier.urihttps://iconarp.ktun.edu.tr/index.php/iconarp/article/view/188/154-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13091/1834-
dc.descriptioniconarpID: 188en_US
dc.descriptioniconarp:ARTen_US
dc.description.abstractUtopia, a phenomenon shaped in the frame of criticism, can be described as a proposal representing hope for the future. Architecture, which is a critical practice, creates new grounds for debate in the discipline with utopia designs. When utopian approaches of the past and contemporary architectural products are examined, it can be observed that utopias can be transformed into the facts of today. In this sense, this article aims to question whether contemporary approaches are inspired by the utopian propositions of the past. It was tried to be comprehended the utopian examples of parasitic architecture and the manifestations of currently produced samples. Examples were criticized with the aid of the analysis sheet prepared in the light of the specified parameters and the contributions of the utopias to the embodiment process of the design in the real world were questioned. In the context of parasitic architecture, it can be seen that approaches of both are similar. The accuracy of the thesis on that, no matter how much time passes over the utopian spatial productions, they continue to be valid and embody in the case of sufficient technology is debated. It is right to say that architecture continues to criticize, produce solutions for the current situations in every period, and doing so, it benefits from the pioneering attitude of utopias. In this sense, the article reveals that utopias are shaping both the human life and the future of architecture, and thus the traces of the past utopias can be encountered today.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherKonya Technical University Faculty of Architecture and Designen_US
dc.relation.ispartofICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planningen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectContemporary architectureen_US
dc.subjectparasitic architectureen_US
dc.subjectutopiaen_US
dc.titleTraces of the Past Utopias in Contemporary Architecture: Parasitic Architectureen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.15320/ICONARP.2018.44-
dc.departmentKTÜNen_US
dc.identifier.volume6en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage170en_US
dc.identifier.endpage195en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Başka Kurum Yazarıen_US
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:ICONARP - International Journal of Architecture and Planning
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
document (18).pdf1.5 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

36
checked on Apr 15, 2024

Download(s)

18
checked on Apr 15, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.