Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13091/1533
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYener, Dündar-
dc.contributor.authorKöklü, Niğmet-
dc.contributor.authorYamaç, Ramazan Ziya-
dc.contributor.authorYalçın, Seher-
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-13T10:41:29Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-13T10:41:29Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.issn1304-6020-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.19-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13091/1533-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study is to determine the trend of studies in the laboratory and put the current situation in Turkey. For this purpose, document analysis technique, one of the qualitative research methods, was used in the research. The data group of the research consists of thesis studies on laboratories in our country between 1999-2017. Theses in the fields of science, physics, chemistry, and biology have been determined and themes and sub-themes have been created through the keywords of these theses. Then, frequency tables were created according to the themes and sub-themes created. According to the findings obtained, it was seen that the traditional laboratory approach and inquiry-based laboratory approaches are compared in the studies. It was determined that the studies were done on physics subjects and it was determined that complementary measurement and evaluation studies performed for performance evaluation were used in very few numbers. In addition, it was concluded that the keywords did not give enough information about the studies. In this context, it can be suggested to examine the effectiveness of these approaches according to each other and experiment types by examining the approaches in which students can be more active in laboratories. © 2020. All Rights Reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEkip Buro Makineleri A.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Turkish Science Educationen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectLaboratory approachesen_US
dc.subjectperformance evaluationen_US
dc.subjectscienceen_US
dc.subjectthesesen_US
dc.titleAnalysis of the Studies Done on Laboratories in Turkeyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.36681/tused.2020.19-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85099911121en_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Mühendislik ve Doğa Bilimleri Fakültesi, Endüstri Mühendisliği Bölümüen_US
dc.identifier.volume17en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage162en_US
dc.identifier.endpage179en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.authorscopusid36544699300-
dc.authorscopusid57221725261-
dc.authorscopusid57221729009-
dc.authorscopusid57221725822-
dc.identifier.trdizinid425633en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
Appears in Collections:Mühendislik ve Doğa Bilimleri Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collections
TR Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / TR Dizin Indexed Publications Collections
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
admin,+1.Yener.pdf716.94 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

3
checked on Apr 20, 2024

Page view(s)

160
checked on Apr 22, 2024

Download(s)

34
checked on Apr 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.