Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13091/1222
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSaid, Noresah-
dc.contributor.authorKhoo, Ying Siew-
dc.contributor.authorLau, Woei Jye-
dc.contributor.authorGürsoy, Mehmet-
dc.contributor.authorKaraman, Mustafa-
dc.contributor.authorTing, Teo Ming-
dc.contributor.authorIsmail, Ahmad Fauzi-
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-13T10:38:36Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-13T10:38:36Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.issn2077-0375-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/membranes10120401-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13091/1222-
dc.description.abstractIn this work, several ultrafiltration (UF) membranes with enhanced antifouling properties were fabricated using a rapid and green surface modification method that was based on the plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD). Two types of hydrophilic monomers-acrylic acid (AA) and 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) were, respectively, deposited on the surface of a commercial UF membrane and the effects of plasma deposition time (i.e., 15 s, 30 s, 60 s, and 90 s) on the surface properties of the membrane were investigated. The modified membranes were then subjected to filtration using 2000 mg/L pepsin and bovine serum albumin (BSA) solutions as feed. Microscopic and spectroscopic analyses confirmed the successful deposition of AA and HEMA on the membrane surface and the decrease in water contact angle with increasing plasma deposition time strongly indicated the increase in surface hydrophilicity due to the considerable enrichment of the hydrophilic segment of AA and HEMA on the membrane surface. However, a prolonged plasma deposition time (>15 s) should be avoided as it led to the formation of a thicker coating layer that significantly reduced the membrane pure water flux with no significant change in the solute rejection rate. Upon 15-s plasma deposition, the AA-modified membrane recorded the pepsin and BSA rejections of 83.9% and 97.5%, respectively, while the HEMA-modified membrane rejected at least 98.5% for both pepsin and BSA. Compared to the control membrane, the AA-modified and HEMA-modified membranes also showed a lower degree of flux decline and better flux recovery rate (>90%), suggesting that the membrane antifouling properties were improved and most of the fouling was reversible and could be removed via simple water cleaning process. We demonstrated in this work that the PECVD technique is a promising surface modification method that could be employed to rapidly improve membrane surface hydrophilicity (15 s) for the enhanced protein purification process without using any organic solvent during the plasma modification process.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversiti Teknologi Malaysia through UTM SGSHINE [Q.J130000.2451.07G79]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipWoei Jye Lau acknowledges the research grant offered by Universiti Teknologi Malaysia through UTM SGSHINE (Grant No. Q.J130000.2451.07G79).en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.relation.ispartofMEMBRANESen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectUltrafiltrationen_US
dc.subjectMembraneen_US
dc.subjectPecvden_US
dc.subjectHydrophilicityen_US
dc.subjectAntifouling Propertyen_US
dc.subjectProtein Purificationen_US
dc.subjectPolyethersulfone Membranesen_US
dc.subjectUf Membranesen_US
dc.subjectPerformanceen_US
dc.subjectSeparationen_US
dc.subjectOxideen_US
dc.subjectPurificationen_US
dc.subjectProteinsen_US
dc.subjectAciden_US
dc.titleRapid Surface Modification of Ultrafiltration Membranes for Enhanced Antifouling Propertiesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/membranes10120401-
dc.identifier.pmidPubMed: 33297433en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85097329875en_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Mühendislik ve Doğa Bilimleri Fakültesi, Kimya Mühendisliği Bölümüen_US
dc.authoridkhoo, ying siew/0000-0003-3812-7683-
dc.authorwosidkhoo, ying siew/ABI-7058-2020-
dc.authorwosidLau, W. J./K-7791-2012-
dc.authorwosidAbouzari-Lotf, Ebrahim/L-2021-2016-
dc.authorwosidTING, Teo Ming/G-2505-2015-
dc.identifier.volume10en_US
dc.identifier.issue12en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000602727700001en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.authorscopusid57189695168-
dc.authorscopusid57217092558-
dc.authorscopusid26326331400-
dc.authorscopusid57208454280-
dc.authorscopusid35269112600-
dc.authorscopusid24377178400-
dc.authorscopusid10040721000-
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.author.dept02.01. Department of Chemical Engineering-
crisitem.author.dept02.01. Department of Chemical Engineering-
Appears in Collections:Mühendislik ve Doğa Bilimleri Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collections
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collections
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collections
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
membranes-10-00401.pdf8.08 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

5
checked on Apr 20, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

17
checked on Apr 20, 2024

Page view(s)

126
checked on Apr 22, 2024

Download(s)

50
checked on Apr 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.