Quantifying the Rock Damage Intensity Controlled by Mineral Compositions: Insights From Fractal Analyses

No Thumbnail Available

Date

2023

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

MDPI

Open Access Color

GOLD

Green Open Access

Yes

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Publicly Funded

No
Impulse
Top 10%
Influence
Average
Popularity
Top 10%

Research Projects

Journal Issue

Abstract

Since each rock type represents different deformation characteristics, prediction of the damage beforehand is one of the most fundamental problems of industrial activities and rock engineering studies. Previous studies have predicted the stress-strain behaviors preceding rock failure; however, quantitative analyses of the progressive damage in different rocks under stress have not been accurately presented. This study aims to quantify pre-failure rock damage by investigating the stress-induced microscale cracking process in three different rock types, including diabase, ignimbrite, and marble, representing strong, medium-hard, and weak rock types, respectively. We demonstrate crack intensity at critical stress levels where cracking initiates (s(ci)), propagates (s(cd)), and where failure occurs (s(peak)) based on scanning electron microscope (SEM) images. Furthermore, the progression of rock damage was quantified for each rock type through the fractal analyses of crack patterns on these images. Our results show that the patterns in diabase have the highest fractal dimensions (D-B) for all three stress levels. While marble produces the lowest D-B value up to s(ci) stress level, it presents greater D-B values than those of ignimbrite, starting from the s(cd) level. This is because rock damage in ignimbrite is controlled by the groundmass, proceeding from such stress level. Rock texture controls the rock stiffness and, hence, the D-B values of cracking. The mineral composition is effective on the rock strength, but the textural pattern of the minerals has a first-order control on the rock deformation behavior. Overall, our results provide a better understanding of progressive damage in different rock types, which is crucial in the design of engineering structures.

Description

Keywords

progressive cracking, rock damage, SEM analysis, fractal dimension, Brittle-Fracture, Quantitative Assessment, Strength, Propagation, Evolution, Roughness, Dimension, Behavior, Model, Compression, fractal dimension, QA299.6-433, SEM analysis, rock damage, QA1-939, Thermodynamics, QC310.15-319, progressive cracking; rock damage; SEM analysis; fractal dimension, progressive cracking, Mathematics, Analysis

Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL

Fields of Science

0211 other engineering and technologies, 02 engineering and technology, 01 natural sciences, 0105 earth and related environmental sciences

Citation

WoS Q

Q1

Scopus Q

Q1
OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
12

Source

Fractal and Fractional

Volume

7

Issue

5

Start Page

383

End Page

PlumX Metrics
Citations

CrossRef : 6

Scopus : 18

Captures

Mendeley Readers : 7

SCOPUS™ Citations

17

checked on Feb 03, 2026

Web of Science™ Citations

17

checked on Feb 03, 2026

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
4.38948893

Sustainable Development Goals

1

NO POVERTY
NO POVERTY Logo

2

ZERO HUNGER
ZERO HUNGER Logo

4

QUALITY EDUCATION
QUALITY EDUCATION Logo

8

DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH
DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH Logo

9

INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE
INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE Logo

11

SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND COMMUNITIES
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND COMMUNITIES Logo

12

RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION
RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION Logo

15

LIFE ON LAND
LIFE ON LAND Logo