Haycam Vs Eigencam for Weakly-Supervised Object Detection Across Varying Scales

No Thumbnail Available

Date

2024

Authors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Open Access Color

GOLD

Green Open Access

No

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Publicly Funded

No
Impulse
Average
Influence
Average
Popularity
Average

Research Projects

Journal Issue

Abstract

When a classification process is performed using Class Activation Maps, which is one of the Explainable Artificial Intelligence approaches, the areas influencing the classification on the input image can be revealed. In other words, it is demonstrated which part of the image the classifier model looks at to make a decision. In this study, a 200-class classification model was trained using the open-source dataset CUB 200 2011, and the classification results were visualized using the EigenCAM and HayCAM methods. When comparing object detection performances based on the areas influencing classification, the EigenCAM method reaches an IoU (Intersection over Union) value of 30.88%, while the HayCAM method reaches a value of 41.95%. The obtained results indicate that outputs derived using Principal Component Analysis (HayCAM) are better than those obtained using Singular Value Decomposition (EigenCAM).

Description

Keywords

Bilgisayar Görüşü, Deep Learning, explainable artificial intelligence;activation map;deep learning;eigencam;haycam, Görüntü İşleme, Computer Vision, Image Processing, Derin Öğrenme, açıklanabilir yapay zeka;aktivasyon haritası;derin öğrenme;eigencam;haycam

Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL

Fields of Science

Citation

WoS Q

N/A

Scopus Q

N/A
OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
N/A

Source

KSÜ Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi

Volume

27

Issue

3

Start Page

1078

End Page

1088
Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
0.0

Sustainable Development Goals

SDG data could not be loaded because of an error. Please refresh the page or try again later.