The Effect of Nanoclay Particles on the Incubation Period in Solid Particle Erosion of Glass Fibre/Epoxy Nanocomposites
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2020
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
During erosion tests of glass fibre/epoxy nanocomposites, an incubation period emerged because of the embedding of abrasive particles into the target material. In this study, the effect of this period on solid particle erosion behaviour was investigated for glass fibre/epoxy composites with the addition of nanoclay. The surface erosion characteristics of the composites were obtained by solid particle erosion tests using angular alumina particles with a size on the order of 400 mu m as the erodent. The tests were conducted using impact velocities of similar to 23 or similar to 34 m/s and impingement angles of 30 degrees, 60 degrees or 90 degrees as operating conditions. The eroded surfaces were examined using a scanning electron microscope to characterise the incubation mechanisms taking place in the nanocomposites. The glass fibre/epoxy composite without nanoclay (the pure test specimen) had the highest erosion resistance when compared to the composites with a nanoclay additive in ratios between 1% and 3% by weight. The findings of this study indicate that the agglomeration and weak compatibility of nanoclay, glass fibre and epoxy affected the results.
Description
ORCID
Keywords
Solid Particle Erosion, Polymer Matrix Composite, Nanotribology, Erosion Testing, Surface Analysis, Mechanical-Properties, Wear Behavior, Composites, Impact, Nanotribology, Erosion Testing, Polymer Matrix Composite, Surface Analysis, Solid Particle Erosion
Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL
Fields of Science
0205 materials engineering, 02 engineering and technology, 0210 nano-technology
Citation
WoS Q
Q1
Scopus Q
Q1

OpenCitations Citation Count
12
Source
WEAR
Volume
444
Issue
Start Page
203159
End Page
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 14
Scopus : 28
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 37
SCOPUS™ Citations
27
checked on Feb 03, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
25
checked on Feb 03, 2026
Google Scholar™


