Effect of Rehabilitative Wall-Foundation Anchorage Types on the Seismic Behaviour of Weak Reinforced Concrete Frames

dc.contributor.author Yavuz, Gunnur
dc.contributor.author Kaltakci, M. Yasar
dc.date.accessioned 2026-01-10T16:40:21Z
dc.date.available 2026-01-10T16:40:21Z
dc.date.issued 2025
dc.description.abstract Installing shear walls in a load-bearing system is one of the most rational, economical, and effective strengthening methods for improving a building system that is vulnerable to seismic effects. One of the most significant points to consider in a reinforced concrete building strengthened with a shear wall is the sufficiency and reliability of anchorage elements in the shear wall-foundation joints, where significant bending moments will occur due to the impact of lateral loads. This study investigated the behaviour of different foundation anchorage methods, including internal anchorage (anchor bars) and external anchorage (steel angle and carbon-fibre-reinforced polymer (CFRP)) applied at the wall-foundation interface in retrofitted weak reinforced concrete frames, which were multi-span, multi-storey, lacking sufficient seismic detailing, and strengthened using wing-type shear walls, under quasi-static lateral loading. It was also aimed to determine the most effective anchorage method for improving the structural performance. A total of six undamaged, but seismically deficient, two-storey, two-span reinforced concrete frames were strengthened with added shear walls that incorporated different anchorage details at the shear wall-foundation joint. According to the test results, the addition of wing-shaped reinforced concrete rehabilitative walls significantly increased the lateral load-carrying capacity, lateral stiffness, and energy dissipation capacity of reinforced concrete frames with poor seismic behaviour. It was observed that additional strengthening was not required in the edge columns of frames with rehabilitative walls of a sufficient length, but that additional measures were required in the foundation anchors at the base of the strengthening wall due to the further increase in the rehabilitative wall capacity. Consequently, the most suitable shear wall foundation anchorage arrangement was achieved with test specimens where one internal anchor bar was used for each vertical shear reinforcement, independently of the shear wall length, and the development length was the highest. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Selcuk University [SU-BAP-2002/018] en_US
dc.description.sponsorship This research was funded by Selcuk University (grant number: SU-BAP-2002/018). en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.3390/buildings15244441
dc.identifier.issn 2075-5309
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-105025769636
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15244441
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/123456789/12890
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher MDPI en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Buildings en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Foundation Anchorage en_US
dc.subject Earthquake en_US
dc.subject Strengthening en_US
dc.subject Rehabilitative Wall en_US
dc.subject Carbon-Fibre-Reinforced Polymer en_US
dc.subject Steel Angle en_US
dc.title Effect of Rehabilitative Wall-Foundation Anchorage Types on the Seismic Behaviour of Weak Reinforced Concrete Frames en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.scopusid 6603867460
gdc.author.scopusid 6507819455
gdc.bip.impulseclass C5
gdc.bip.influenceclass C5
gdc.bip.popularityclass C5
gdc.description.department Konya Technical University en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp [Yavuz, Gunnur] Konya Tech Univ, Fac Engn & Nat Sci, Dept Civil Engn, TR-42250 Konya, Turkiye en_US
gdc.description.issue 24 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q2
gdc.description.startpage 4441
gdc.description.volume 15 en_US
gdc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded
gdc.description.wosquality Q2
gdc.identifier.openalex W4417161897
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:001646947600001
gdc.index.type WoS
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.oaire.impulse 0.0
gdc.oaire.influence 2.4895952E-9
gdc.oaire.popularity 2.7494755E-9
gdc.openalex.collaboration National
gdc.opencitations.count 0
gdc.plumx.newscount 1
gdc.plumx.scopuscites 0
gdc.scopus.citedcount 0
gdc.virtual.author Yavuz, Günnur
gdc.wos.citedcount 0
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 92a28e71-c8ca-47a1-b5d3-9ccffe7693aa
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 92a28e71-c8ca-47a1-b5d3-9ccffe7693aa

Files