Statistical Optimization of Ettringite Precipitation in Landfill Leachate
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2018
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
BRAZILIAN SOC CHEMICAL ENG
Open Access Color
GOLD
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
0
OpenAIRE Views
2
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
In the present study, experiments were conducted to optimize sulfate removal efficiency with ettringite precipitation from landfill leachate using Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and Central Composite Design (CCD). The statistical analysis of the results showed that the operating parameters such as molar rates of Ca/SO4 and Al/SO4, and pH had a significant effect on sulfate removal efficiency. Aluminum hydroxide and calcium hydroxide were used for external sources of aluminum and calcium. The goodness of the model was checked by different criteria including the coefficient of determination (R-2 = 0.94), p value (<0.0001), adequate precision (14.78), and coefficient of variance (7.30). The RSM results indicated that the fitted model could be appropriate to predict sulfate removal efficiency. A 55.7% maximum sulfate removal efficiency was obtained at pH 11.95 for 2.29 Ca/SO4 and 0.74 Al/SO4 molar ratios. Sulfate inhibition effects on treatment methods such as the anaerobic process decreased with increasing COD/SO4 ratio from 14:1 to 25:1 by ettringite precipitation.
Description
ORCID
Keywords
Ettringite Precipitation, Landfill, Leachate, Response Surface Methodology (Rsm), Sulphate Removal, Response-Surface Methodology, Sulfate-Reducers, Waste-Water, Start-Up, Removal, Oxidation, Methanogens, Aluminum, Response Surface Methodology (RSM), Leachate, Ettringite Precipitation, Landfill, Sulphate Removal
Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL
Fields of Science
01 natural sciences, 0105 earth and related environmental sciences
Citation
WoS Q
Q3
Scopus Q
Q3

OpenCitations Citation Count
6
Source
BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
Volume
35
Issue
3
Start Page
969
End Page
975
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 1
Scopus : 6
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 23
SCOPUS™ Citations
6
checked on Feb 03, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
6
checked on Feb 03, 2026
Downloads
1
checked on Feb 03, 2026
Google Scholar™


