An Experimental Evaluation on the Dynamic Response of Water Aged Composite/Aluminium Adhesive Joints: Influence of Electrospun Nanofibers Interleaving
Loading...
Date
2022
Authors
Tatar, Ahmet Caner
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
The impact response of adhesives is a critical design parameter considering their lifetime. Additionally, environmental effects such as water or moisture may cause to degrade of the polymer-based adhesive and shorten its service life. This study aimed to investigate the impact response of water-aged aluminium-composite adhesively bonded single lap joints (SLJs). Nylon 6.6 nanofibers modified with graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs) were introduced in the adhesion areas to increase adhesive performance. The water aging resulted in decreased impact resistance in all cases. However, nanofiber-modified SLJs exhibited comparatively higher impact performance under both non-aged and water-aged conditions. Further, the GNP reinforced nylon 6.6 nanofibers increased the maximum impact load by 15 and 19% compared to neat nanofibers before and after aging, respectively. The fracture surfaces were examined via scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to understand damage and toughness mechanisms. A schematic model has been developed to explain the mechanisms leading to improved bonding performance by applying N6.6 nanofiber reinforcement to the adhesion zone.
Description
Keywords
Epoxy, Graphene Nanoplatelet (Gnp), Nylon 6, 6 (N6, 6) Nanofiber, Single Lap Joints (Slj), Low-Velocity Impact (Lvi), Water Aging, Low-Velocity Impact, Mechanical-Properties, Fracture-Toughness, Damage Formation, Composite, Failure, Nanocomposite, Durability, Strength, Pipes
Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL
Fields of Science
02 engineering and technology, 0210 nano-technology
Citation
WoS Q
Q1
Scopus Q
Q1

OpenCitations Citation Count
21
Source
COMPOSITE STRUCTURES
Volume
280
Issue
Start Page
114852
End Page
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 28
Scopus : 28
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 22
SCOPUS™ Citations
26
checked on Feb 03, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
29
checked on Feb 03, 2026
Google Scholar™


