A Comparative Study of Swarm Intelligence and Evolutionary Algorithms on Urban Land Readjustment Problem

dc.contributor.author Koç, İsmail
dc.contributor.author Babaoğlu, İsmail
dc.date.accessioned 2021-12-13T10:32:06Z
dc.date.available 2021-12-13T10:32:06Z
dc.date.issued 2021
dc.description.abstract Land Readjustment and redistribution (LR) is a land management tool that helps regular urban development with the contribution of landowners. The main purpose of LR is to transform irregularly developed land parcels into suitable forms. Since it is necessary to handle many criteria simultaneously to solve LR problems, classical mathematical methods can be insufficient due to time limitation. Since LR problems are similar to traveling salesman problems and typical scheduling problems in terms of structure, they are kinds of NP-hard problems in combinatorial optimization. Therefore, metaheuristic algorithms are used in order to solve NP-hard problems instead of classical methods. At first, in this study, an effective problem-specific objective function is proposed to address the main criteria of the problem. In addition, a map-based crossover operator and three different mutation operators are proposed for the LR, and then a hybrid approach is implemented by utilizing those operators together. Furthermore, since the optimal value of the problem handled in real world cannot be exactly estimated, a synthetic dataset is proposed as a benchmarking set in LR which makes the success of algorithms can be objectively evaluated. This dataset consists of 5 different problems according to number of parcel which are 20, 40, 60, 80 and 100. Each problem set consists of 4 sub-problems in terms of number of landowners per-parcel which are 1, 2, 3 and 4. Therefore, the dataset consists of 20 kinds of problems. In this study, artificial bee colony, particle swarm optimization, differential evolution, genetic and tree seed algorithm are used. In the experimental studies, five algorithms are set to run under equal conditions using the proposed synthetic dataset. When the acquired experimental results are examined, genetic algorithm seems to be the most effective algorithm in terms of both speed and performance. Although artificial bee colony has better results from genetic algorithm in a few problems, artificial bee colony is the second most successful algorithm after genetic algorithm in terms of performance. However, in terms of time, artificial bee colony is an algorithm nearly as successful as genetic algorithm. On the other hand, the results of differential evolution, particle swarm optimization and tree seed algorithms are similar to each other in terms of solution quality. In conclusion, the statistical tests clearly show that genetic algorithm is the most effective technique in solving LR problems in terms of speed, performance and robustness. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106753
dc.identifier.issn 1568-4946
dc.identifier.issn 1872-9681
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85092012210
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106753
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13091/881
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher ELSEVIER en_US
dc.relation.ispartof APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Swarm Intelligence en_US
dc.subject Urban Land Readjustment en_US
dc.subject Map-Based Crossover And Mutation Operator en_US
dc.subject Synthetic Dataset en_US
dc.subject Artificial Bee Colony en_US
dc.subject Tree-Seed Algorithm en_US
dc.subject Differential Evolution en_US
dc.subject Genetic Algorithm en_US
dc.subject Optimization en_US
dc.subject Implementation en_US
dc.subject Growth en_US
dc.subject Image en_US
dc.subject Tool en_US
dc.title A Comparative Study of Swarm Intelligence and Evolutionary Algorithms on Urban Land Readjustment Problem en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.scopusid 57190306475
gdc.author.scopusid 23097339300
gdc.bip.impulseclass C4
gdc.bip.influenceclass C5
gdc.bip.popularityclass C4
gdc.coar.access metadata only access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.description.department Fakülteler, Mühendislik ve Doğa Bilimleri Fakültesi, Bilgisayar Mühendisliği Bölümü en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q1
gdc.description.startpage 106753
gdc.description.volume 99 en_US
gdc.description.wosquality Q1
gdc.identifier.openalex W3088601600
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:000608175000015
gdc.index.type WoS
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.impulse 8.0
gdc.oaire.influence 2.9647738E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen false
gdc.oaire.popularity 8.689954E-9
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 02 engineering and technology
gdc.openalex.collaboration National
gdc.openalex.fwci 0.69132233
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.69
gdc.opencitations.count 9
gdc.plumx.crossrefcites 9
gdc.plumx.mendeley 28
gdc.plumx.scopuscites 9
gdc.scopus.citedcount 9
gdc.virtual.author Koç, İsmail
gdc.virtual.author Babaoğlu, İsmail
gdc.wos.citedcount 8
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 6bbf4fad-28ee-44c0-88b8-8cf9e32d9130
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 871b6e10-080d-4f91-8bf5-c78453b0d57d
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 6bbf4fad-28ee-44c0-88b8-8cf9e32d9130

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
1-s2.0-S1568494620306918-main.pdf
Size:
7.69 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format