Clustering Analysis Through Artificial Algae Algorithm
Loading...
Date
2022
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Springer Heidelberg
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Clustering analysis is widely used in many areas such as document grouping, image recognition, web search, business intelligence, bio information, and medicine. Many algorithms with different clustering approaches have been proposed in the literature. As they are easy and straightforward, partitioning methods such as K-means and K-medoids are the most commonly used algorithms. These are greedy methods that gradually improve clustering quality, highly dependent on initial parameters, and stuck a local optima. For this reason, in recent years, heuristic optimization methods have also been used in clustering. These heuristic methods can provide successful results because they have some mechanism to escape local optimums. In this study, for the first time, Artificial Algae Algorithm was used for clustering and compared with ten well-known bio-inspired metaheuristic clustering approaches. The proposed AAA clustering efficiency is evaluated using statistical analysis, convergence rate analysis, Wilcoxon's test, and different cluster evaluating measures ranking on 25 well-known public datasets with different difficulty levels (features and instances). The results demonstrate that the AAA clustering method provides more accurate solutions with a high convergence rate than other existing heuristic clustering techniques.
Description
Keywords
Data clustering, Clustering analysis, Artificial algae algorithm, Optimization Algorithm, Swarm Optimization, Firefly Algorithm
Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL
Fields of Science
0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, 02 engineering and technology
Citation
WoS Q
Q3
Scopus Q
Q2

OpenCitations Citation Count
27
Source
International Journal Of Machine Learning And Cybernetics
Volume
13
Issue
4
Start Page
1179
End Page
1196
PlumX Metrics
Citations
Scopus : 31
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 19
SCOPUS™ Citations
31
checked on Feb 03, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
25
checked on Feb 03, 2026
Google Scholar™


