Co-Flotation of Effluents From Detergent and Marble Processing Industries in Denver and Dispersed Air Flotation Systems

dc.contributor.author Yel, E.
dc.contributor.author Onen, V.
dc.contributor.author Kalem, M.
dc.date.accessioned 2024-08-10T13:37:28Z
dc.date.available 2024-08-10T13:37:28Z
dc.date.issued 2024
dc.description.abstract Suspended solids in the marble processing wastewater (MPWW) have the potential to pollute receiving media. Likewise, detergent production wastewater (DPWW) needs treatment prior to discharge as they include surfactants and others. Flotation and its modifications are common for separation purposes in various engineering solutions. To increase flotation performance by changing the surface tension some collector and frother chemicals, surfactants are utilized. Detergents are among important surfactants and they may act as both frother and collector in flotation. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of DPWW in co-flotation with MPWW. Two effluents were mixed at varying ratios and dispersed air (DISP) and Denver (DEN) flotation co-treatment were applied to the mixtures. Volume ratio, time and air flow rate on treatment performance were investigated. Turbidity, solids, COD, phosphate removals were achieved at varying levels when the flotation was applied to the mixture. The highest treatment performance was achieved at 90%MPWW-10%DPWW mixture. 10 min flotation time and 2 L min−1 air flow rate for the DEN system, and 20 min and 6 L min−1 for the DISP system were recommended. Under these conditions turbidity, SS, COD, phosphate and alkalinity residuals (and removal efficiencies) were 2400 NTU(82%), 1720 mg.L−1(89%), 313.6 mg.L−1(10%), 20 mg.L−1(20%) and 600 mg.L−1CaCO3(92%) in the DEN system, respectively. Whereas, in the DISP system, under the same conditions, final values of 1880 NTU(86%), 1540 mg.L−1(91%), 262 mg.L−1(17%), 21 mg.L−1(20%) and 470 mg.L−1(94%) were obtained, respectively. The highest SludgeSS concentration increased up to 19300 mg.L−1 in the 90%–10% mixture. In all samples, dewaterable sludge was obtained. By this study, co-flotation of these two effluents was recommended. Within SDGs, this approach will replace frother chemical usage. The process performance can further be enhanced via flotation modifications and technology can be developed as further study. © 2024 Elsevier Ltd en_US
dc.description.sponsorship 16401122 en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.142728
dc.identifier.issn 0045-6535
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85198004750
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.142728
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13091/6072
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Elsevier Ltd en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Chemosphere en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Co-treatment; Flotation; Industrial wastewater; SDGs en_US
dc.subject Air; Alkalinity; Flotation; Industrial research; Industrial water treatment; Soaps (detergents); Turbidity; Wastewater treatment; Air flow-rate; Air Systems; Co treatments; Condition; Frothers; Industrial wastewaters; Marble processing; Processing industry; SDG; Treatment performance; Effluents; detergent; concentration (composition); effluent; phosphate; pollutant removal; Sustainable Development Goal; wastewater treatment; airflow; alkalinity; Article; effluent; flotation; sludge; sludge treatment; suspended particulate matter; turbidity; wastewater en_US
dc.title Co-Flotation of Effluents From Detergent and Marble Processing Industries in Denver and Dispersed Air Flotation Systems en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.institutional
gdc.author.scopusid 37017748000
gdc.author.scopusid 35776889700
gdc.author.scopusid 58872366900
gdc.bip.impulseclass C5
gdc.bip.influenceclass C5
gdc.bip.popularityclass C5
gdc.coar.access metadata only access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.description.department KTÜN en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp Yel, E., Konya Technical University, Environmental Engineering Department, Konya, Turkey; Onen, V., Konya Technical University, Mining Engineering Department, Konya, Turkey; Kalem, M., Konya Technical University, Environmental Engineering Department, Konya, Turkey en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q1
gdc.description.startpage 142728
gdc.description.volume 362 en_US
gdc.description.wosquality Q1
gdc.identifier.openalex W4400147017
gdc.identifier.pmid 38950753
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.index.type PubMed
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.impulse 0.0
gdc.oaire.influence 2.4895952E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen false
gdc.oaire.keywords Surface-Active Agents
gdc.oaire.keywords Detergents
gdc.oaire.keywords Industrial Waste
gdc.oaire.keywords Flocculation
gdc.oaire.keywords Wastewater
gdc.oaire.keywords Waste Disposal, Fluid
gdc.oaire.keywords Water Pollutants, Chemical
gdc.oaire.popularity 2.3737945E-9
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.openalex.collaboration National
gdc.openalex.fwci 0.39693981
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.56
gdc.opencitations.count 0
gdc.plumx.mendeley 6
gdc.plumx.scopuscites 1
gdc.scopus.citedcount 1
gdc.virtual.author Önen, Vildan
gdc.virtual.author Yel, Esra
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 88478d67-7b8e-440c-9979-a637e6e5be11
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 67732110-f32e-417d-803b-d92d67871090
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 88478d67-7b8e-440c-9979-a637e6e5be11

Files