Shear Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Beams Utilizing Waste Marble Powder
Loading...
Date
2023
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Elsevier Science Inc
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Today, it has been determined that waste marble dust (WMD) is not evaluated and therefore creates environmental problems. For this reason, in this study, the usability of WMD in different proportions, in which waste materials are evaluated, was investigated. Thus, it is aimed to eliminate the existing environmental problems by ensuring the use of WMD in reinforced concrete beams (RCBs). Pursuant to this motivation, an experimental program was carried out on 15 shear deficient RCBs, considering different WMD and stirrup spacing. While the proportion of WMD in the RCBs was chosen as 10%, 20%, 30% and 40% by weight, respectively, the stirrup spacing was considered as 270 mm, 200 m, and 160 mm. Concrete compressive strength (CCS) is generally adversely affected while WMD is used instead of cement at 10% or more rates. In RCB samples with the stirrup spacing of 270 mm, 200 mm, and 160 mm, 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40% WMD additives reduced the bearing capacity of the RCBs compared to the reference sample. It has been observed that ACI 318 (2019) and EC2 (2004) design regulations demonstrate excellent performance (maximum 85% success) in estimating shear strength up to 20% marble dust admixture in RCBs where the stirrup spacing is 200 mm and 160 mm. The results revelaed that using up to 5% of WMD instead of cement has approximately no negative influence on the CCS. Nevertheless, if this percentage is chosen as 10% or more, it has been found that the CCS is commonly destructively affected.
Description
Keywords
Beam, Concrete, Marble, Powder, Recycled, Waste, Mechanical-Properties, Partial Replacement, Cement, Metakaolin, Strength, Dust, Ash
Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL
Fields of Science
Citation
WoS Q
Q1
Scopus Q
Q1

OpenCitations Citation Count
16
Source
Structures
Volume
54
Issue
Start Page
1090
End Page
1100
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 18
Scopus : 25
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 33
SCOPUS™ Citations
24
checked on Feb 03, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
24
checked on Feb 03, 2026
Google Scholar™


