Artificial Intelligence Based High Voltage Cable Bonding To Prevent Cable Termination Faults
Loading...
Date
2020
Authors
Akbal, Bahadır
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Cable termination fault (CTF) is a major problem for high voltage cable lines (HVCL). Increasing of the sheath voltage (SV), zero sequence current (ZC) and current harmonic distortion (THDI) on metallic sheath (MS) of HVC are major factors for CTF. MS is grounded according to IEEE 575-1988 standard to reduce SV. However, these methods are not sufficient to prevent CTF based on ZC and THDI. The aims of this paper are minimization of SV, ZC and THDI to prevent CTF based on ZC and THDI. Thus, LSSB method is developed as a new bonding method. Also, LSSB parameters should be optimized to make the most economical and practical bonding. GA, DEA, PSO and iPSO are used optimization methods for optimization of LSSB. SV and THDI should be known for optimization of LSSB, so the forecasting methods (FM) are used as fitness function of optimization methods in LSSB optimization. The regression and hybrid artificial neural network methods are compared to determine the most suitable FM. When the optimized LSSB is used for bonding of long HVCL, SV reduces approximately 90%, ZC reduces approximately 93%, and THDI reduces approximately 70%. Thus CTF risk is minimized by using the optimized LSSB in HVCL.
Description
ORCID
Keywords
Bonding Method, High Voltage Cable Termination, Hybrid Artificial Neural Network, Insulation Fault, Power Transmission, Danish Experience, Systems, Sheath
Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL
Fields of Science
0211 other engineering and technologies, 0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, 02 engineering and technology
Citation
WoS Q
Q2
Scopus Q
Q1

OpenCitations Citation Count
2
Source
ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH
Volume
187
Issue
Start Page
106513
End Page
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 2
Scopus : 2
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 13
SCOPUS™ Citations
2
checked on Feb 03, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
1
checked on Feb 03, 2026
Google Scholar™


