Optimum Amount of Cfrp for Strengthening Shear Deficient Reinforced Concrete Beams

No Thumbnail Available

Date

2022

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Techno-Press

Open Access Color

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Research Projects

Journal Issue

Abstract

The behavior of shear deficient under-balanced reinforced concrete beams with rectangular cross-sections, which were externally strengthened with CFRP composite along shear spans, was experimentally investigated under vertical load. One of the specimens represents a reference beam without CFRP strengthening and the other specimens have different width/strip spacing ratios (w(f)/s(f)). The optimum strip in terms of w(f)/s(f), which will bring the beam behavior to the ideal level in terms of strength and ductility, was determined according to the regulations. When the w(f)/s(f) ratio exceeds 0.55, the behavior of the beam shifted from shear failure to bending failure. However, it has been observed that the w(f)/s(f) ratio should be increased up to 0.82 in order for the beam to reach sufficient shear reserve value according to the codes. It is also observed that the direction and weight of the CFRP composite are one of the most critical factors and 240 gr/m(2) CFRP strips experienced sudden ruptures in the shear span after the cracking of the concrete. It is considered as a deficiency that the empirical shear capacity formulas given for the beams reinforced with CFRP in the regulations do not take into account both direction and weight of CFRP composites.

Description

Keywords

CFRP composite, damage history analysis, Optimum FRP, reinforced concrete beam, shear deficient, strengthening, Rc Beams, Deep Beams, T-Beams, Failure Analysis, Frp Sheets, Behavior, Performance, Gfrp, Damage, Composites

Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL

Fields of Science

Citation

WoS Q

Q1

Scopus Q

Q1
OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
2

Source

Steel and Composite Structures

Volume

43

Issue

6

Start Page

735

End Page

757
PlumX Metrics
Citations

Scopus : 48

Captures

Mendeley Readers : 5

SCOPUS™ Citations

47

checked on Feb 04, 2026

Web of Science™ Citations

45

checked on Feb 04, 2026

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™

Sustainable Development Goals

SDG data is not available