Evaluation of Test Field-Based Calibration and Self-Calibration Models of Uav Integrated Compact Cameras

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2022

Authors

Karabörk, Hakan
Makineci, Hasan Bilgehan

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

SPRINGER

Open Access Color

Green Open Access

No

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Publicly Funded

No
Impulse
Top 10%
Influence
Average
Popularity
Top 10%

Research Projects

Journal Issue

Abstract

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), which have made a name for themselves in photogrammetry studies in recent years, provide users with integrated camera systems. Identifying interior orientation parameters, such as focal coordinates, focal length and distortions, is an essential requirement for camera systems used for photogrammetric purposes. This process, which is called camera calibration, is offered automatically by software from the library. Another important known calibration method is self-calibration. Calibrating cameras by creating 2D or 3D test areas is a troublesome and grueling option. However, it is the most commonly accepted way in terms of accuracy. In this study, images were taken in different test areas (2D and 3D) to perform the calibrations of the cameras integrated on two different UAVs, namely DJI Phantom 4 Pro and Parrot Anafi. The calibration parameters determined from the images taken were compared with the calibration parameters obtained by the self-calibration method, and block adjustment was performed with ground control points marked in the study area. In order to perform performance analysis, the root-mean-square error (RMSE) was determined from the control points. In conclusion, it was determined that the results of both the calibrations obtained with the test fields and those obtained with self-calibration were acceptable.

Description

Keywords

Interior orientation, Non-metric camera calibration, Self-calibration, UAV, 2D, 3D camera calibration

Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL

Fields of Science

0211 other engineering and technologies, 02 engineering and technology, 01 natural sciences, 0105 earth and related environmental sciences

Citation

WoS Q

Q3

Scopus Q

Q1
OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
8

Source

JOURNAL OF THE INDIAN SOCIETY OF REMOTE SENSING

Volume

50

Issue

Start Page

13

End Page

23
PlumX Metrics
Citations

Scopus : 10

Captures

Mendeley Readers : 7

SCOPUS™ Citations

10

checked on Feb 03, 2026

Web of Science™ Citations

9

checked on Feb 03, 2026

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
2.81578725

Sustainable Development Goals

SDG data is not available