Evaluation of Test Field-Based Calibration and Self-Calibration Models of Uav Integrated Compact Cameras
Loading...
Date
2022
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
SPRINGER
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), which have made a name for themselves in photogrammetry studies in recent years, provide users with integrated camera systems. Identifying interior orientation parameters, such as focal coordinates, focal length and distortions, is an essential requirement for camera systems used for photogrammetric purposes. This process, which is called camera calibration, is offered automatically by software from the library. Another important known calibration method is self-calibration. Calibrating cameras by creating 2D or 3D test areas is a troublesome and grueling option. However, it is the most commonly accepted way in terms of accuracy. In this study, images were taken in different test areas (2D and 3D) to perform the calibrations of the cameras integrated on two different UAVs, namely DJI Phantom 4 Pro and Parrot Anafi. The calibration parameters determined from the images taken were compared with the calibration parameters obtained by the self-calibration method, and block adjustment was performed with ground control points marked in the study area. In order to perform performance analysis, the root-mean-square error (RMSE) was determined from the control points. In conclusion, it was determined that the results of both the calibrations obtained with the test fields and those obtained with self-calibration were acceptable.
Description
Keywords
Interior orientation, Non-metric camera calibration, Self-calibration, UAV, 2D, 3D camera calibration
Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL
Fields of Science
0211 other engineering and technologies, 02 engineering and technology, 01 natural sciences, 0105 earth and related environmental sciences
Citation
WoS Q
Q3
Scopus Q
Q1

OpenCitations Citation Count
8
Source
JOURNAL OF THE INDIAN SOCIETY OF REMOTE SENSING
Volume
50
Issue
Start Page
13
End Page
23
PlumX Metrics
Citations
Scopus : 10
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 7
SCOPUS™ Citations
10
checked on Feb 03, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
9
checked on Feb 03, 2026
Google Scholar™


