Repository logoGCRIS
  • English
  • Türkçe
  • Русский
Log In
New user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your password?
Home
Communities
Browse GCRIS
Entities
Overview
GCRIS Guide
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Ogutcu, Sermet"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Article
    Citation - WoS: 2
    Citation - Scopus: 3
    The Effect of Ambiguity Resolution on the Precision of the Gps/Galileo Ppp Using a U-Blox Zed-F9p Low-Cost Gnss Receiver
    (Elsevier Sci Ltd, 2025) Ogutcu, Sermet; Duman, Huseyin; Ozdemir, Behlul Numan; Alcay, Salih
    Thanks to the increasing number of low-cost dual-frequency GNSS receivers available on the market, the usability of these receivers for geodetic applications is increasing. Recently, PRIDE Lab at GNSS Research Center of Wuhan University has started to produce GNSS observable-specific phase biases for all-frequency. This enables precise point positioning with ambiguity resolution (PPP-AR) not only for conventional frequencies but also for other arbitrary frequencies. In this work, static and kinematic PPP-AR precision of the u-blox ZED-F9P low-cost GNSS receiver are investigated by comparing it with a geodetic-grade GNSS receiver using GPSonly, Galileo-only, and GPS + Galileo combinations for nearly two months period. Wide-lane (WL) and Narrow-lane (NL) AR fixing rates, cycle slips, code multipath, and frequency availability are also investigated for both receivers. In the positioning domain, GPSonly, Galileo-only, and GPS + Galileo PPP positioning precision using float ambiguities is significantly improved after AR for both receivers. GPS + Galileo PPP provides the best precision comparing with the other PPP solutions for both receivers using float and fix ambiguities. For static GPS + Galileo PPP-AR, the standard deviation of north, east, and up components are computed as 2.7/1.7/3.2 mm and 2.2/2.3/5.4 mm for the geodetic receiver and the u-blox receiver, respectively. The results also reveal that kinematic PPP-AR for the u-blox receiver is not as reliable as the geodetic-grade receiver yet suggesting potential for improvement in future iterations. (c) 2024 COSPAR. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
Repository logo
Collections
  • Scopus Collection
  • WoS Collection
  • TrDizin Collection
  • PubMed Collection
Entities
  • Research Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • Projects
  • Awards
  • Equipments
  • Events
About
  • Contact
  • GCRIS
  • Research Ecosystems
  • Feedback
  • OAI-PMH

Log in to GCRIS Dashboard

Powered by Research Ecosystems

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Feedback