Akay, Büşra SelviÜnal, AlptuğKoçer, Mustafa2024-11-202024-11-202022978-605-72864-2-0https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13091/6643Spectral acceleration values that will affect the structure during an earthquake are obtained from the design acceleration spectra in the regulations, and the earthquake loads that will affect the structure are determined by the dynamic and static methods in the regulations. Although dynamic methods are more realistic and more difficult to understand, they are applied on all existing buildings if a sufficient number of natural vibration modes and their contributions reach the limit values specified in the regulations. Static methods, on the other hand, are obtained by calculating the spectral acceleration value determined depending on the dynamic feature of the structure, depending on the mass of the structure, and distributing it as a static load, taking into account the first mode of the structure. Compared to dynamic methods, there are limitations of usage areas and building height classes. In the regulations, in order to make the design earthquake calculation simpler, they suggest static methods as the design spectrum and liken it to the dynamic method. The main purpose of this study is to compare the vertical earthquake analysis required according to the structural defects defined in TEC 2018 according to the code design spectrum and linear time history analysis. According to TEC 2018, static and dynamic earthquake load analyzes were carried out on buildings with different overhang rates. It has been observed that the structural results according to the dynamic lateral load analysis are quite low compared to the assumptions in the static method. The regulation remains on the safe side in calculating the vertical earthquake force with the static earthquake load analysis.eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTEC 2018Equivalent Earthquake LoadTH Vertical Earthquake Load AnalysisVertical Design SpectrumConference Object