Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13091/2746
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorErcoşkun, Ceren-
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-15T17:38:32Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-15T17:38:32Z-
dc.date.issued2020-10-15-
dc.identifier.urihttps://iconarch.ktun.edu.tr/index.php/iconarch/article/view/267/231-
dc.identifier.urihttps://iconarch.ktun.edu.tr/index.php/iconarch/article/view/267-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13091/2746-
dc.description267en_US
dc.descriptioniconarch:S4en_US
dc.description.abstractRural gentrification means socio-economic and spatial transformation of rural areas with decrease in productive population, rural activities and agricultural activities. It brings urbanization of the countryside. Expropriation of local people and rural poverty, unemployment, migration of young population, inaccessibility of basic services are important problems of rural areas. Agricultural production and agricultural land, pastures are lost, rural structures began to be abandoned. In contrast, some urbanites longing for nature, make urban agriculture, urban farming, or urban gardening in rural areas or urban periphery. Urban agriculture is the practice of cultivating, processing and distributing food in or around urban areas. Urban agriculture can also involve animal husbandry, aquaculture, agroforestry and urban beekeeping. Urban agriculture provides access to nutritious, healthy and safe food. It creates a sense of belonging between urbanites, and farmers in urban-rural space. It also gives a learning opportunity of growing food and makes efficient use of land. However, land owners have the privilege of altering natural and built landscapes. Inheritance of agricultural land reproduces inequalities. Ownership of agricultural land enables production of symbolic wealth. The migration of middle-class migrants into specific locales changes the locale's physical appearance, social status and socio-demographic composition. This study aims to put these urban agriculture and rural gentrification paradox with a case study in Sirkeli-Ankara. Sirkeli which was a village turned to neighborhood of Pursaklar district in Ankara. However, the rural activities are still on-going by the villagers and urbanites making urban agriculture. In this context, socio-spatial literature research on rural gentrification and urban agriculture were made. In depth interviews were made with the villagers, urbanites which have weekend houses and making urban agriculture and real estate owners. All kinds of visual and audio material were used to make discourse analysis through multimedia and key highlights are revealed.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherKonya Technical University Faculty of Architecture and Designen_US
dc.relation.ispartofICONARCH International Congress of Architecture and Planning; 2020: ICONARCH IV - Space and Process in Architecture and Planningen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectRural Gentrificationen_US
dc.subjectUrban Agricultureen_US
dc.subjectSirkeli-Ankaraen_US
dc.titleRural Gentrification or Urban Agriculture? A Case Study on Sirkeli-Ankaraen_US
dc.typeConference Objecten_US
dc.identifier.volumeICONARCH IVen_US
dc.identifier.startpage479en_US
dc.identifier.endpage490en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKonferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Başka Kurum Yazarıen_US
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeConference Object-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
Appears in Collections:ICONARCH - International Congress of Architecture and Planning
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
document - 2023-03-20T144940.712.pdf8.28 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

46
checked on Apr 22, 2024

Download(s)

14
checked on Apr 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check





Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.