Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13091/2568
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorUlukavak Harputlugil, Gülsu-
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-15T17:35:49Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-15T17:35:49Z-
dc.date.issued2012-11-17-
dc.identifier.urihttps://iconarch.ktun.edu.tr/index.php/iconarch/article/view/24/19-
dc.identifier.urihttps://iconarch.ktun.edu.tr/index.php/iconarch/article/view/24-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13091/2568-
dc.description24en_US
dc.descriptioniconarch:S1en_US
dc.description.abstractEnergy performance in buildings issue has become one of the most important subject matters in Turkiye, especially regarding the procedure of accreditation within European Union. There are many studies conducted in the context varying from developing standards and regulations to inventory of buildings in the frame of energy performance parameters. In this paper, it is aimed to evaluate building energy performance regulation that became mandatory since 2010 and its calculation methodology called BEP-tr. There are several problems announced by the users of BEP-tr many of whom are mechanical engineers. Based on the critics related with national calculation methodology, it is necessary to reveal the capacity of the software by testing accuracy. The content of the paper includes a deep review of Turkish Building Energy Performance Regulation and its calculation methodology regarding the importance of regulations as a big step forward to high performance buildings. The evaluation of national calculation methodology (BEP-tr) has been performed in order to reveal substantial problems. An internationally recognised validation and diagnostic procedure, BESTEST was applied to test the accuracy of calculation methodology. The first part of the paper is dedicated to a discussion related with the current status of the regulation. Then, the results of BESTEST cases were interpreted in order to find out whether the national calculation methodology is inside the confidence interval. The results highlighted the basic errors of calculation methodology and project a vision for further improvements of the software.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherKonya Technical University Faculty of Architecture and Designen_US
dc.relation.ispartofICONARCH International Congress of Architecture and Planning; 2012: ICONARCH I - ARCHITECTURE AND TECHNOLOGYen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectRegulationsen_US
dc.subjectBESTESTen_US
dc.subjectBEP-tren_US
dc.titleAssessing the Accuracy of National Calculation Methodology of Turkiye (Bep-Tr) by Using Bestesten_US
dc.typeConference Objecten_US
dc.identifier.volumeICONARCH Ien_US
dc.identifier.startpage66en_US
dc.identifier.endpage75en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKonferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Başka Kurum Yazarıen_US
item.openairetypeConference Object-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
Appears in Collections:ICONARCH - International Congress of Architecture and Planning
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
document - 2023-03-31T102519.485.pdf3.72 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

112
checked on Mar 25, 2024

Download(s)

30
checked on Mar 25, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check





Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.