Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13091/220
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAlkan Bala, Havva-
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-13T10:23:53Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-13T10:23:53Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.issn2147-9380-
dc.identifier.issn2147-9380-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2018.57-
dc.identifier.urihttps://app.trdizin.gov.tr/makale/TXpjNU9UZzRPQT09-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13091/220-
dc.description.abstractIn this study, the closed neighborhood was discussed in gated communities and in cul-de-sacs by focusing on public and private concepts, rights and regulations in Turkish urban culture. The study aims to enlighten old concepts such as “close neighborhood,” “gated community,” and “cul-de-sac” with a new approach in order to understand whether planned and modern gated communities contain the same aspects of traditional Turkish cul-de-sacs – part of the “fina” concept. According to tradition and culture, the concept of fina is a kind of usage of public space as if it were private. In the modern age, gated communities have created new life styles, spaces and boundaries with their advantages and disadvantages all over the world. The gated community may be called an “architecture of fear,” namely fear of the neighbors, fear of theft, fear of the one living outside the gates. On the other hand, cul-de-sacs are derived from friendships and family relations – namely, being friends with relatives, neighbors and nature. Gated communities and cul-de-sacs are both created by making public space – belonging to all citizens – into private/semi-private space belonging to only a special community. A comparative method is used between gated communities and cul-de-sacs in order to understand whether the legalization of using public space in private ways creates benefits to society as a whole or not. The result expected from this study is not only to determine the similarities and differences pertaining to cul-de-sacs and gated communities but also to reveal the positive values generated or existing in these two living areas and provide feedback with the potential of reflecting each other.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planningen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.titleNeighborhood from Cul-De- Sac to Gated Community in Turkish Urban Culture: The “Fina”en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.15320/ICONARP.2018.57-
dc.departmentFakülteler, Mimarlık ve Tasarım Fakültesi, Mimarlık Bölümüen_US
dc.identifier.volume6en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage333en_US
dc.identifier.endpage357en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000454597000005en_US
dc.institutionauthorBala, Havva Alkan-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid379988en_US
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.author.dept04.01. Department of Architecture-
Appears in Collections:ICONARP - International Journal of Architecture and Planning
Mimarlık ve Tasarım Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
TR Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / TR Dizin Indexed Publications Collections
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collections
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
76ebd229-09ad-4d6d-b677-485e5ed7cade.pdf1.63 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

100
checked on Apr 22, 2024

Download(s)

30
checked on Apr 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.