Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13091/1894
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBektaş, Yasin-
dc.contributor.authorSakarya, Adem-
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-26T20:52:44Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-26T20:52:44Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.issn2147-9380-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2020.135-
dc.identifier.urihttps://iconarp.ktun.edu.tr/index.php/iconarp/article/view/456-
dc.identifier.urihttps://iconarp.ktun.edu.tr/index.php/iconarp/article/view/456/260-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13091/1894-
dc.descriptioniconarpID: 456en_US
dc.descriptioniconarp:ARTen_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose The present study aims to analyze the accessibility and adequacy of the emergency assembly areas (EAAs) in Kadıköy which has the highest ratio of at-risk buildings in Istanbul.Design/Methodology/ApproachIn this study, accessibility and adequacy of the EAAs are analyzed. To analyze the accessibility network analysis carried out within a geographic information system (GIS) program is used. Through an accessibility analysis, the ratio of the population that resides within 500 m walking distance of each EEA was ascertained. Furthermore, an adequacy analysis was carried out to measure the size of each emergency assembly area, and its adequacy for the population within its catchment area was analyzed. In addition, an accessibility and adequacy analysis were made of the social infrastructure facilities that have been defined as second-level emergency assembly areas.Findings According to the research findings, 57 percent of the current population of the district resides within 500 m of one or more of Kadıköy’s 73 EEAs. It was found also that the emergency assembly areas accessible by three-quarters of the population within 500 m could be considered inadequate. Based on these findings, it was concluded that emergency assembly areas should be of adequate size, away from disaster risks and accessible to all residents, and that the standards for the open and closed areas within the emergency assembly areas should be defined in legislation and included as mandatory in future plans.Research Limitations/Implications The research was limited to Kadıköy which has the highest ratio of at-risk buildings in Istanbul.Originality/ValueWhen evaluated alongside relevant studies regarding EAAs, the present study can be said to contribute to literature in its analysis of both the accessibility and adequacy of the existing EAAs and secondary assembly areas, taking a holistic approach, the study makes use of a network analysis method in the GIS program to identify the number of people living in each residential structure within the Kadıköy district. In addition, the study seeks to contribute further to literature by measuring the accessibility of social and technical infrastructure within the city planning discipline through a network analysis.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherKonya Technical University Faculty of Architecture and Designen_US
dc.relation.ispartofICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planningen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectDisaster risken_US
dc.subjectemergency assembly areaen_US
dc.subjectintegrated disaster managementen_US
dc.subjectnetwork analysisen_US
dc.subjecturban planningen_US
dc.subjectDisaster risk managementen_US
dc.titleAN EVALUATION OF AN INTEGRATED DISASTER MANAGEMENT AND AN EMERGENCY ASSEMBLY AREA: THE CASE OF KADIKÖY, ISTANBULen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.15320/ICONARP.2020.135-
dc.departmentKTÜNen_US
dc.identifier.volume8en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage745en_US
dc.identifier.endpage770en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Başka Kurum Yazarıen_US
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
Appears in Collections:ICONARP - International Journal of Architecture and Planning
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
document (54).pdf2.97 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

254
checked on Mar 25, 2024

Download(s)

152
checked on Mar 25, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.