Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13091/1833
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBaşaran Uysal, Arzu-
dc.contributor.authorSakarya, Ipek-
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-26T20:51:06Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-26T20:51:06Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.issn2147-9380-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2018.40-
dc.identifier.urihttps://iconarp.ktun.edu.tr/index.php/iconarp/article/view/176-
dc.identifier.urihttps://iconarp.ktun.edu.tr/index.php/iconarp/article/view/176/165-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13091/1833-
dc.descriptioniconarpID: 176en_US
dc.descriptioniconarp:ARTen_US
dc.description.abstractThis article examines rural gentrification as experienced on the North Aegean coasts of Turkey. The study area chosen is the closest Aegean coast to İstanbul and it attracts attention because of its archeological and mythological values, as well as its natural beauty and vernacular landscape. The most important element determining the rural landscape of the region is olive production.Depopulation in rural areas since 1950s and development of tourism in coastal areas after 1980 has brought about the investment-disinvestment cycle which is in the rural gentrification theory. The migration from urban to rural and tourism activities, which began in the rural area studied in 1980s, gained momentum in 2000s, real estate prices rose. It has been observed that in the rural area where tourism facilities have been improved, gentrification occurs in parallel. It is possible to categorize the newcomers as summer house vacationists, retired people, national elite and entrepreneurs. The study is based principally on in-depth interviews with village mukhtars, local people, newcomers, tourism entrepreneurs, and professionals. Newcomers and new economies change the rural landscape. However, the real estate market did not yet play a significant role in the rural gentrification in this area, unlike in developed Western countries. On the other hand, replacement of the agricultural sector by the service sector and change in land use creates post-productive landscape in North Aegean Countryside.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherKonya Technical University Faculty of Architecture and Designen_US
dc.relation.ispartofICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planningen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectRural gentrificationen_US
dc.subjectrural landscapeen_US
dc.subjectrural transformationen_US
dc.subjectAdatepeen_US
dc.subjectrural landscapeen_US
dc.titleRural gentrification in the North Aegean Countryside (Turkey)en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.15320/ICONARP.2018.40-
dc.departmentKTÜNen_US
dc.identifier.volume6en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage99en_US
dc.identifier.endpage125en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Başka Kurum Yazarıen_US
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
Appears in Collections:ICONARP - International Journal of Architecture and Planning
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
document (82).pdf1.36 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

34
checked on Mar 25, 2024

Download(s)

14
checked on Mar 25, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.