Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13091/1790
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGünay, Zeynep-
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-26T20:51:02Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-26T20:51:02Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.issn2147-9380-
dc.identifier.urihttps://iconarp.ktun.edu.tr/index.php/iconarp/article/view/47-
dc.identifier.urihttps://iconarp.ktun.edu.tr/index.php/iconarp/article/view/47/67-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13091/1790-
dc.descriptioniconarpID: 47en_US
dc.descriptioniconarp:ARTen_US
dc.description.abstractThe paper claims that the renewal schemes, which have been employed as an evolving model in resolving the urbanisation problem, are turned into the instruments of “urbicide” in Istanbul as a political “evolving” model of urban destruction. The concerns arising out of this change of emphasis encompass conflicts between theory and practice, as well as conflicts between marketing and planning, process and action, authenticity and diversity, users and owners, opportunities and threats. Within this scope, by constructing an urban renewal framework through the exploration of Law on the Protection and the Revitalisation of Deteriorated Historical and Cultural Immovable Assets (2005) and Law on the Transformation of Areas under Disaster Risk (2012), the paper intents to discuss the evolving and declining urbanisation patterns in Istanbul by relating them with up-to-date political, economic, technological and socio-economic inferences. Considerable emphasis is placed on the use of examples in Historic Peninsula to illustrate and critically analyze meanings, inputs, outputs and impacts. The paper concludes by addressing in what ways the planning as a profession can manage these evolving and declining models in resolving contradictions stemming from the dichotomy of urbanisation and urbicide in Istanbul.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherKonya Technical University Faculty of Architecture and Designen_US
dc.relation.ispartofICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planningen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectUrban renewalen_US
dc.subjecturbicideen_US
dc.subjectIstanbulen_US
dc.titleRenewal Agenda in Istanbul: Urbanisation vs. Urbicideen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.departmentKTÜNen_US
dc.identifier.volume3en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage95en_US
dc.identifier.endpage108en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Başka Kurum Yazarıen_US
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
Appears in Collections:ICONARP - International Journal of Architecture and Planning
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
zeynep+gunay+95-108.pdf1.87 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

54
checked on Mar 25, 2024

Download(s)

24
checked on Mar 25, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check





Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.