Prioritization of Land Consolidation Projects Using the Multi-Criteria Best-Worst Method: a Case Study From Poland

No Thumbnail Available

Date

2023

Authors

Ertunc, Ela
Uyan, Mevlut

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Springer

Open Access Color

Green Open Access

No

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Publicly Funded

No
Impulse
Top 10%
Influence
Average
Popularity
Top 10%

Research Projects

Journal Issue

Abstract

In order to balance the needs of ecology, environment, and agricultural productivity with the aim of revitalizing rural areas, every local government unit that plans to implement a land consolidation (LC) project should decide where to start these projects as a priority. Traditionally, some of these decisions are made by groups of people connected to the consolidated area, while the others are made by groups of people from government departments, all trying to make the best possible decision. However, one of the most important conditions for the successful implementation of these projects, requiring large investment costs is, determining the priority areas for LC projects and allocating the investments to the appropriate areas meticulously. This study proposed a new model for determining priority areas for LC projects. In this study, by determining a set of criteria according to the parameters taken from 75 villages (Malopolska region, Poland), a model was developed for prioritizing LC projects using the Best-Worst Method (BWM), a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method. The proposed model enables the transparent identification and prioritization of villages for land consolidation by national and local authorities, effective management of resources, and equitable allocation of financial assistance.

Description

Keywords

Agriculture, Decision-making method, Land management, Priority, Project ranking, Decision-Making, Supplier Selection, Productivity, Areas, Fragmentation, Performance, Criteria, Government Agencies, Ecology, Humans, Agriculture, Poland, Environmental Monitoring

Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL

Fields of Science

Citation

WoS Q

Q3

Scopus Q

Q2
OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
6

Source

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

Volume

195

Issue

9

Start Page

End Page

PlumX Metrics
Citations

Scopus : 10

PubMed : 1

Captures

Mendeley Readers : 21

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
1.92428754

Sustainable Development Goals

7

AFFORDABLE AND CLEAN ENERGY
AFFORDABLE AND CLEAN ENERGY Logo

8

DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH
DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH Logo

9

INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE
INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE Logo

12

RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION
RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION Logo

13

CLIMATE ACTION
CLIMATE ACTION Logo