Developing Social Sustainability Criteria and Indicators in Urban Planning: a Holistic and Integrated Perspective
Loading...
Date
2023
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Konya Technical University Faculty of Architecture and Design
Open Access Color
GOLD
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
One of the main reasons for today’s urban problems is the disregarding of social sustainability in urban interventions and the lack of an approach that evaluates social sustainability with all its issues as a universal and holistic one. In this context, the aim of this study is to determine and categorize social sustainability criteria, objectives, and indicators to measure and to assess social sustainability for ensuring the sustainability of cities that could be used in all urban areas and applied in urban planning. Within this scope, social sustainability criteria, objectives, and indicators identified by international organizations and academic/scientific studies on different scales and in urban areas were evaluated systematically and analytically. A matrix has been generated according to the frequency of occurrence of social sustainability criteria and indicators. Although research studies focus on criteria and indicators according to scale, subject, and specified matters. It is a necessity to identify social sustainability criteria and indicators that can be used on every scale and in every urban area. Accordingly, ten criteria have been determined: population, accessibility, education and skills, health, housing, security, belonging, participation, social capital and social cohesion, urban life quality, satisfaction, and adequacy of services. Based on the criteria, targets, sub-targets, indicators, and indicator definitions for each criterion have been identified. However, the significance of each criterion is addressed, as well as the reasons for their necessity for social sustainability. This study proposes a universal, detailed, and holistic perspective for the measurement and assessment of social sustainability that enables the use of both quantitative and qualitative data together and envisages the use of mixed techniques in obtaining and evaluating data. In addition, criteria and indicator systems will be able to guide practitioners and policymakers to make decisions related to the social structure before and after the implementation of urban projects.
Description
Keywords
Social sustainability, Criteria and indicators of social sustainability, Measurement of social sustainability, Urban sustainability, Criteria and indicators of social sustainability, measurement of social sustainability, Urban sustainability, NA1-9428, Measurement of social sustainability, social sustainability, Social sustainability, criteria and indicators of social sustainability, HT165.5-169.9, Architecture, urban sustainability,, City planning
Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL
Fields of Science
05 social sciences, 0211 other engineering and technologies, 02 engineering and technology, 0502 economics and business
Citation
WoS Q
N/A
Scopus Q
N/A

OpenCitations Citation Count
N/A
Source
ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning
Volume
11
Issue
1
Start Page
1
End Page
23
PlumX Metrics
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 34
Downloads
1
checked on Feb 03, 2026
Google Scholar™

OpenAlex FWCI
0.6426248
Sustainable Development Goals
1
NO POVERTY

4
QUALITY EDUCATION

8
DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH

9
INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE

10
REDUCED INEQUALITIES

11
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND COMMUNITIES

14
LIFE BELOW WATER

17
PARTNERSHIPS FOR THE GOALS


