Assessment of the Rural Economic Structure of Gudul Town (ankara) by Quantified Swot Analysis

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2020

Authors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

KONYA TECHNICAL UNIV, FAC ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN

Open Access Color

GOLD

Green Open Access

Yes

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Publicly Funded

No
Impulse
Average
Influence
Average
Popularity
Average

Research Projects

Journal Issue

Abstract

Purpose Rather than solely having agricultural production at its core, rural development comprises of a multiaxial structure in which the socio-economic structure develops, non-agricultural economic diversification is assured, and a governance-based approached is adopted in the organization and participation mechanisms. The applicability and consistency of these intertwined axes entail an integrated approach to efforts in rural development. With the purpose of uncovering the critical points of the process, creating strategies intended for rural economic development within the axes valued by different stakeholders, and strengthening the participation mechanisms, SWOT Analysis, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) integrated method, and TOWS matrix have been used to identify the Gudul rural economic development model. Design/Methodology/Approach In this study, the hierarchical structure established for the economic structure of Gudul is placed on the foundations of a SWOT analysis, quantified through Analytic Hierarchy Process, and evaluated within the framework of the three stakeholder's perceptions (local people, experts, and local governments) according to their priority values. Findings Thus, the extent of the respective effects of important factors in rural economic development has been identified. In conclusion, the decisive role of quantified methods in the identification of strategies and policies utilized in the process of Gudu's rural economic development has been manifested. Various strategies supporting the rural development and also institutions responsible for the implementation of these strategies were designated in light of the needs of Gudul and the expectations of the local people living in rural areas. Research Limitations/Implications The version of the questionnaire forms compatible with the SWOT-AHP technique, the scarcity of local manager surveys, the lack of answers to the questions of the local people are among the main difficulties encountered. Originality/Value This study is quite original in that it is the first strategic rural development plan model made specifically for Gudul, related to the participation of indigenous people in planning initiatives and transparently reflects the sometimes combined and sometimes changing views of local people, experts and local administrators about the importance of SWOT groups has a quality.

Description

Keywords

Analytic Hierarchy Process, Gudul, Rural Development, SWOT, TOWS, SWOT, Analytic Hierarchy Process, Rural Development, NA1-9428, Urban Planning, Kırsal Gelişim, HT165.5-169.9, Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci, Architecture, TOWS, Analytic Hierarchy Process, Güdül, Rural Development, SWOT, TOWS, Rural Areas, Rural Development, Güdül, City planning

Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL

Fields of Science

0211 other engineering and technologies, 02 engineering and technology, 01 natural sciences, 0105 earth and related environmental sciences

Citation

WoS Q

Scopus Q

N/A
OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
1

Source

ICONARP INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING

Volume

8

Issue

2

Start Page

672

End Page

702
PlumX Metrics
Captures

Mendeley Readers : 10

Web of Science™ Citations

1

checked on Feb 03, 2026

Downloads

4

checked on Feb 03, 2026

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
0.23160112

Sustainable Development Goals

2

ZERO HUNGER
ZERO HUNGER Logo

4

QUALITY EDUCATION
QUALITY EDUCATION Logo

8

DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH
DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH Logo

9

INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE
INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE Logo

11

SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND COMMUNITIES
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND COMMUNITIES Logo

12

RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION
RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION Logo